+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: Trump for president (/thread-12458.html)
RE: Trump for president - Donovan - 06-09-2016
(06-09-2016, 12:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I don't know why you feel like you have such great insight into California life and feel so compelled to stereotype a state and the people living it, Maggot. But, I can guess as to your motivations.
It's funny and not atypical for you.
I don't believe that I have such powers, and I'm not compelled to do the same. I'm a realist.
California is and really ought to be two different states. The tone is so different from north to south.
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 06-09-2016
(06-09-2016, 06:45 PM)Donovan Wrote:(06-09-2016, 12:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I don't know why you feel like you have such great insight into California life and feel so compelled to stereotype a state and the people living it, Maggot. But, I can guess as to your motivations.
It's funny and not atypical for you.
I don't believe that I have such powers, and I'm not compelled to do the same. I'm a realist.
California is and really ought to be two different states. The tone is so different from north to south.
Cut it in 1⁄2 , we keep the top 1⁄2 and give mexico back the shit down south. Problem solved.
RE: Trump for president - Donovan - 06-09-2016
Hollywood is south, and a shitload of money.
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 06-09-2016
They can keep it. We can make movies elsewhere.
RE: Trump for president - Donovan - 06-09-2016
Screw that, all the pretty people are there. They can have Compton, Lynwood and Southgate, that whole area. But damned if I'm giving up the beaches and Lauryl Canyon.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 06-09-2016
F.U, you should probably get cracking on that annexation of Southern California to Mexico right quick.
If you wait too long, that big beautiful wall will have to be demolished and rebuilt.
I don't think Mexico will write a second check for demolition and a third one for reconstruction!
(Actually, I don't think Mexico is gonna pay for any border wall, ever. But, I don't wanna harsh your dream of "Dividing the U.S.! -- Literally and Figuratively!").
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 06-09-2016
All joking aside, that is one part of this country I have never wanted to visit. I am in the process of planning a week long trip to the west coast [why? because I have never ben out west and need to finish my border to border coast to coast goal.]. I don't know exactly where I will end up but it sure wont be banafornia. I know I am going to see a old friend that lives in Denver but from there I really don't know.
Wow, can I get any more off topic?
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 06-09-2016
(06-09-2016, 07:20 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: F.U, you should probably get cracking on that annexation of Southern California to Mexico right quick.
If you wait too long, that big beautiful wall will have to be demolished and rebuilt.
I don't think Mexico will write a second check for demolition and a third one for reconstruction!
(Actually, I don't think Mexico is gonna pay for any border wall, ever. But, I don't wanna harsh your dream of "Dividing the U.S.! -- Literally and Figuratively?")
Now that there is funny. I actually laughed out loud. Thanks
RE: Trump for president - Donovan - 06-09-2016
I think we should go ahead and invade Mexico and annex the whole damn thing. Then, the wall we build at our southern border would be a hell of a lot skinnier and cheaper, and it would confuse the fuck out of the Mexicans currently digging tunnels on the north end of Mexico.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 06-09-2016
(06-09-2016, 07:23 PM)F.U. Wrote: All joking aside, that is one part of this country I have never wanted to visit. I am in the process of planning a week long trip to the west coast [why? because I have never ben out west and need to finish my border to border coast to coast goal.]. I don't know exactly where I will end up but it sure wont be banafornia. I know I am going to see a old friend that lives in Denver but from there I really don't know.
Wow, can I get any more off topic?
Well.......
If you get cracking on your plan to shrink the U.S. and enlarge Mexico, and you postpone your vacation until your dream becomes reality, you can visit OBK and Biggie in Mexico without having to 'endure' a California road trip.
Maybe you all could be extras on a movie set; you could play "a band of gringos" or something like that.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 06-10-2016
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declined to rule out rescinding his endorsement of Donald Trump when interviewed by Bloomberg Politics.
He said it's no secret that Donald Trump has very little knowledge about the issues, as he felt was clearly demonstrated during the debates.
McConnell also criticized Trump again for the ignorant public rants in regards to judge Curiel and said he told Trump to use a script in public addresses from then on.
McConnell told the interviewer that Trump will need to choose a VP who's very experienced and knowledgeable about the issues to help Trump do the job adequately if he's elected.
Story: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/us/politics/mitch-mcconnell-donald-trump.html?_r=0
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-10-2016
(06-10-2016, 02:30 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: He said it's no secret that Donald Trump has very little knowledge about the issues
That's one of the reasons I'm so excited about the debates. I get damn near giddy when I think about it.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 06-10-2016
(06-10-2016, 02:32 PM)Duchess Wrote:(06-10-2016, 02:30 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: He said it's no secret that Donald Trump has very little knowledge about the issues
That's one of the reasons I'm so excited about the debates. I get damn near giddy when I think about it.
If Clinton doesn't take the bait and get all tangled up in Trump's name-calling on the debate stage, and she and the moderators keep the focus on the issues and the candidates' policies for addressing them, I think he's gonna get creamed. I have plenty of criticism for Clinton, but ignorance of the issues and how to address them are not among those criticisms.
I don't know if Trump's devoted fans or the hard-core Hillary haters will care if he does really poorly debating Clinton though. Some of them actually think he won the primary debates because they liked the entertainment value.
But, the one-on-one general debates are a whole different ballgame and level of seriousness. And, McConnell's advice to use a script and a wingman won't be available to him in those contests. I think undecided voters and those who care more about the country than stubbornly sticking with Trump will care a lot if he doesn't know what he's talking about or continues to use only ad hominem tactics.
I think the debates will be very interesting too.
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-10-2016
(06-10-2016, 02:52 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: If Clinton doesn't take the bait and get all tangled up in Trump's name-calling
I don't think she will. I think that possibility will always be front & center in her mind whenever she has to deal with him. She's got his number!
RE: Trump for president - F.U. - 06-10-2016
I don't know why, in my head I keep hearing Big D saying, I know you are but what am I, During the debates.
I cant wait for the sound bites to start rolling.
RE: Trump for president - HairOfTheDog - 06-11-2016
Mitt Romney was interviewed by Wolf Blitzer yesterday.
Romney said he won't be voting for Trump, nor Clinton. He'll write in someone else and didn't rule out Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson.
"Trickle down racism" is one thing Romney fears will happen in the U.S. if Trump is elected.
He also said that Trump doesn't fear losing voters if he shoots someone on the street, but he fears losing voters if he releases his tax returns. Romney believes that indicates that there's something very bad that would be revealed in Trump's returns (which he's positive Trump will never release; he'll just keep making excuses).
I'm sure Clinton's camp will use Romney's statements in her campaign.
Trump responded to Romney's comments at a rally yesterday. He said Romney ran in 2012 and he 'choked like a dog'. Trump also said that he (Trump) is the least racist person there is.
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-11-2016
Fuckface is back to referring to Elizabeth Warren as Pocahontas. Good! Keep name calling and ditch the teleprompter, Donald.
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-12-2016
Donald says if he were truly a racist he wouldn't have the support and endorsement of Don King and other high profile blacks, (which he refuses to name, btw) which in turn has forced Don King to publicly respond by saying he hasn't endorsed Donald and yet fuckface is still running around the country making those claims! Hahaha!
This is more fun than a barrel of monkeys.
RE: Trump for president - Maggot - 06-12-2016
I don't understand why illegals cannot just get a green card and come in. Why do they have to sneak in? If it becomes acceptable policy they will continue to give the middle finger to American laws and more will do it. If they know its not worth sneaking in they won't do it but enticing them with free health care and all the amenities that legal Americans get will make them go the easy route.
If I was an illegal that went through all the work to get legal status I would be pissed. Why is it so "right" to sneak in?
RE: Trump for president - Duchess - 06-12-2016
I still can't get over that they don't have any fear, that goes back to the illegal suing an American, I can't even remember what it was for, all I recall is that he had no fear, no fear of being around LEO's, no fear of being a courthouse, simply no fear.