THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (/thread-12806.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
|
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Fry Guy - 04-05-2019 (04-05-2019, 04:53 PM)Rootilda Wrote: Trump also has some cronies at Maralago that have given him "advice" on the Veteran's Administration even though none of them have military backgrounds. People seeking lucrative government contracts also use membership to gain admittance to Trump and he makes a ton of money from membership dues. No black people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for white people No white people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for black people No women can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for men No men can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for women No disabled people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for non-disabled people No non-disabled people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for disabled people No adults can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for children No children can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for adults No religious can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for non-religious people No non-religious people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for religious people No veterans can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for non-veterans No non-veterans can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for veterans I am helping you out pointing out your logic in case any people with any critical thinking were confused about your idiocy. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 04-06-2019 (04-05-2019, 08:56 PM)Rootilda Wrote: Yeah, that would be maddening. The only wind farms I've seen have been isolated, which is how they should be. There should be more of these as well as solar panels. That's the future, it's not fucking coal or any of the other ridiculous bullshit people talk about. Why does it have to be so goddamn difficult to get people to think about ways to be energy independent. Jesus. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Fry Guy - 04-06-2019 I can answer this one for you. Neither wind farms nor solar are as effective as coal-fired energy. The delivery and effectiveness is with the coal-fired. The reason the delivery systems are better has a lot to do with the fact that the default has been built into energy infrastructure for forever. Now CAN a conversation be had to investing in less effective energy source which do not have the pre-existing infrastructure and such? Absolutely. But it would be retarded to say that it is the future (rather it is a possibility for the future) and it is also retarded to say people are ridiculous for not holding your ideas about their importance. Isn't that correct? RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - pyropappy - 04-06-2019 BEFORE AFTER Quite a difference RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 04-06-2019 Aye carumba! RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Rootilda - 04-06-2019 The residents of Tijuana appreciate the free gift of razor wire. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/border-baja-california/sd-me-concertina-wire-tj-20190318-story.html RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Maggot - 04-06-2019 I remember Tijuana when it was Velvet Elvis's, cheap whores, good mescal and cheap taxis..........now look at the mess it is now. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Rootilda - 04-06-2019 I bought a couple of tacos from a street vendor way back in the '70s down there. I have no idea what kind of meat it was but it was delicious. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Fry Guy - 04-07-2019 (04-06-2019, 09:12 PM)Rootilda Wrote: The residents of Tijuana appreciate the free gift of razor wire. Why do they need razor wire on their properties? I heard all the folks from around that area are very peaceful and commit crimes at much less the rate of American citizens and they are so upstanding that they do not even need to be vetted before coming into the US. In fact to do so is immoral. Did I hear right? RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 04-07-2019 Best fish tacos I have had was from a plywood shack in a parking spot in Tijuana, that might have been the trip where I bootie bumped a stripper off the 3' stage and her stiletto flew through the air almost hitting the bouncer in the face who then proceeded to chase me out of the bar with a billy club. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - pyropappy - 04-07-2019 Dems lose another one DC Circuit RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 04-07-2019 You read Lawfare? I'm so surprised! I thought the Conservative Tree House was more your speed. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 04-07-2019 ...and it's funny (not funny) that you would view that as a loss for the Democrats. It should be seen as a loss for all Americans. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - pyropappy - 04-07-2019 (04-07-2019, 02:34 PM)Duchess Wrote: ...and it's funny (not funny) that you would view that as a loss for the Democrats. It should be seen as a loss for all Americans. interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Fry Guy - 04-07-2019 (04-07-2019, 09:07 PM)pyropappy Wrote:(04-07-2019, 02:34 PM)Duchess Wrote: ...and it's funny (not funny) that you would view that as a loss for the Democrats. It should be seen as a loss for all Americans. The same kind of ideology that thinks that it is both a shame that the President was not a Russian Asset but also even when they knew that every aspect of the origin of the special counsel and FISA applications and wiretapping and unmasking was all illegal and done solely to get Trump out "at all costs", give all those actions a free pass, BECAUSE it is Trump. They also are unable to see every dirty trick and every case of colouring outside the lines allows their opponents to do likewise next time a similar situation presents on their side. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - MirahM - 04-07-2019 Good thing you have it all figured out! RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Fry Guy - 04-07-2019 (04-07-2019, 11:09 PM)MirahM Wrote: Good thing you have it all figured out! I am hardly an island. This is hardly up for grabs as an idea. It has always been a matter of WHEN are they going to act on it and WHY the wait? Hell even the Ukrainians in court for a matter that Christopher Steele (remember him) was involved in, they testified that Hillary conspired with The Ukrainians to help win the 2016 election and HAVE OFFERED to testify to this end and send sworn statements. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats. The Department of Justice do not seem to be interested. The Democrats in the same situation would latch onto this like a dog with a bone. It is entirely the fault of the Republicans and the Intelligence communities. Either they are playing a "we fight honourably and give benefit of the doubt and let sleeping dogs lie" and such OR they are just fucking useless OR they are setting the other side up and making sure every i is dotted and every t crossed. I used to be absolutely convinced of the last choice and now I think that it is equally as likely to be either of the other two. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 04-08-2019 (04-07-2019, 09:07 PM)pyropappy Wrote: interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss A filthy trump supporter *spits* talking about upholding the rule of law. Ahahahahahaha! Next thing you know you'll be addressing how he honors the Constitution. This is all so rich and delicious. RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Fry Guy - 04-08-2019 (04-08-2019, 04:24 AM)Duchess Wrote:(04-07-2019, 09:07 PM)pyropappy Wrote: interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss What SPECIFICALLY in the Constitution has he NOT honoured. Not what did he do that you did not like but what specific aspects of the Constitution has he not honoured. You can't can you? This was just a talking point that someone told you that you repeated. Conspiracy theorist much? RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 04-08-2019 (04-08-2019, 04:24 AM)Duchess Wrote:(04-07-2019, 09:07 PM)pyropappy Wrote: interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss Yeah, fortunately Trump's unconstitutional proposals and threats have thus far been struck down by the U.S. courts, have been legally challenged prior to implementation, or have amounted to nothing more than rile-up rhetoric for the base. For example........ His "Muslim Ban" Executive Order was struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the 'religious freedom' constitutional guarantee and reworked several times, finally passing constitutional muster as the "Travel Ban". His threat to revoke birthright citizenship (violation of 14th Amendment) has gone nowhere. I think the case against President Trump alleging violations of the Constitution's emoluments clause is still pending. Etc. |