+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (/thread-12806.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 10-03-2023
(10-03-2023, 10:39 AM)Donovan Wrote: There are no generals defending Trump. Not in this country anyway
Wow, you do have a sense of humor.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - rothschild - 10-03-2023
(10-03-2023, 12:06 PM)Duchess Wrote: Which one of those presidents that you refer to being worse than trump have sold out America? Which one of them sided with Putin? I look forward to your response.
All of them.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - MirahM - 10-04-2023
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT8MtKKnY/
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - sally - 10-04-2023
You need to stop watching that dumb shit.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-04-2023
(10-04-2023, 12:23 AM)sally Wrote: You need to stop watching that dumb shit.
Dumb shit? Those are your kind of people. That's what you like. Ewww. So fucking gross, Sally.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - MirahM - 10-04-2023
I don't seek it out.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - sally - 10-04-2023
(10-04-2023, 04:57 AM)Duchess Wrote:(10-04-2023, 12:23 AM)sally Wrote: You need to stop watching that dumb shit.
Dumb shit? Those are your kind of people. That's what you like. Ewww. So fucking gross, Sally.
In that case I can go and find a million videos of liberal Biden supporting freaks and I guess those are your kind of people. I have to go out, but I’ll be back later with tons of moronic videos of people from “your team”.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-04-2023
Looking forward to it.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 10-04-2023
comb bah yeah me lawd...
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-05-2023
![[Image: F7ojBAnWYAAycvq?format=jpg&name=large]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F7ojBAnWYAAycvq?format=jpg&name=large)
![[Image: F7ojBAmWoAAJ06_?format=jpg&name=medium]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F7ojBAmWoAAJ06_?format=jpg&name=medium)
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 10-05-2023
Kelley shilled for Trump like a good retired military man . . . until he realized he was not in command.
Just like Cohen. Fucking bigger cry-babies than the Donald.
I can't stop drawing the comparison between the Trump trial characters and an attempt to proffer the American public a sophomoric Billions episode.
Trump - Bobby Axelrod
James - Chuck Rhoades
Engoron - Adam DeGiuilio
And am still waiting to see the monetary damages and victims who suffered by Trump's alleged fraud.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-06-2023
Help!
![[Image: F7q_GxOWcAI8tpO?format=jpg&name=medium]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F7q_GxOWcAI8tpO?format=jpg&name=medium)
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 10-06-2023
ORANGE LIVES MATTER!
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-06-2023
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-06-2023
I'd like to add that in regards to him bleating "I don't even get a jury" is his lawyers fault. They had the opportunity to request a trial by jury and didn't do so.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 10-06-2023
(10-06-2023, 08:17 AM)Duchess Wrote: I'd like to add that in regards to him bleating "I don't even get a jury" is his lawyers fault. They had the opportunity to request a trial by jury and didn't do so.
Yeah . . . it wasn't as simple as merely checking a box . . . as is being reported and repeated.
Or a simple "request" for a trial, by jury.
Prosecution under this statute does not include the absolute right to trial by jury. It was a brilliant and strategic move (using this statute) to bring charges against him . . . and legally deny him of this right.
Again . . . another example of the "Economy of Truth" syndrome when reporting (spinning) on Trump.
Nice try.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-06-2023
You present that as if he were tricked, he was not. He wasn't denied anything. As with everyone, he has rights. His attorneys didn't do their due diligence, THAT'S what it comes down to.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 10-06-2023
How would you even know that to be 100% factual?
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 10-06-2023
(10-06-2023, 02:06 PM)BigMark Wrote: How would you even know that to be 100% factual?
That his attorneys didn't do their due diligence?
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 10-06-2023
(10-06-2023, 11:30 AM)Duchess Wrote: You present that as if he were tricked, he was not. He wasn't denied anything. As with everyone, he has rights. His attorneys didn't do their due diligence, THAT'S what it comes down to.
No. That is not true. This proceeding, by default, is a bench trial. By the very nature of the statutory charge and proceeding, he is automatically denied a trial by jury.
In the majority of criminal trials, the defendant has the right and choice of bench or jury . . . jury trial is automatic. Not this one.
Pray tell . . . what omitted due diligence would guarantee, that the defendant, would be guaranteed a trial by jury?
If you are to believe, as the judge stated, there were two boxes on the "form" . . . one for jury trial and another for bench.
Again, if you believe the judge, he stated neither was checked.
So . . . if NEITHER box was checked, what gave the judge the authority to proceed . . . as a bench trial . . . without clarification . . . from either the prosecution or defense?
Keep spinning!