+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS (/thread-13145.html)
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - pyropappy - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 05:47 AM)Duchess Wrote:(11-07-2021, 07:06 PM)Maggot Wrote: Say what you will but the entire thing has been based on lies.
Nope, no it wasn't. Your own party investigated. It's not an opinion, it's facts and it's funny as fuck to watch you claim facts aren't real.
Lizzie are you really that brain washed, or are you just to stupid to breathe?
LINK: 14 REFERALS TO DOJ
Now whether the corrupt DC elites do any thing is any one's guess, but I ain't holding my breath.
I keep telling you it's both sides of the aisle ; the whole system is corrupt.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 11-08-2021
(11-07-2021, 02:46 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-05-2021, 07:15 PM)Maggot Wrote: The entire Russian Collusion thing has been found to be nothing but lies
*ahem* No, no it has not.
Maybe you could defend that by stating exactly what is inaccurate?
Presenting innuendo as facts is highly inaccurate, and potentially criminal.
Claiming it's factual because anti-Trump Republicans believe it is, is incredibly absurd considering the fact that both parties have a well-established history when it comes to chicanery and misrepresentation during hearings.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 11-08-2021
Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - BigMark - 11-08-2021
Talk about bizarro world, Trump was accused of wanting to have sex with his daughter but Biden took showers with his teenage daughter but no, CNN won't touch that with a 10'' pole.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 11:53 AM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.
What evidence from the Treasury Dept. are you referring to?
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 12:03 PM)BigMark Wrote: Talk about bizarro world, Trump was accused of wanting to have sex with his daughter but Biden took showers with his teenage daughter but no, CNN won't touch that with a 10'' pole.
This is the first I'm hearing of that. Where can I read about it?
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 11-08-2021
rothschild thinks people have to be told they are under investigation.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 12:10 PM)Duchess Wrote: rothschild thinks people have to be told they are under investigation.
Are you really this stupid, or is it dishonesty?
There are laws against entrapment, and they are much tougher with respect to government officials. Investigating is fine, if you have legitimate cause for concern, but it is not OK to secretly record an interview that is made to appear as a professional discussion. If you have any doubts about this you need to read what Inspector General Michael Horowitz had to say about it, and the FISA warrants.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 12:07 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:53 AM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.
What evidence from the Treasury Dept. are you referring to?
You posted it, so I'll let you look for it. It was 4-5 months ago, give or take a month.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - BigMark - 11-08-2021
https://twitter.com/BigFish3000/status/1456789786979614725/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1456789786979614725%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 12:35 PM)BigMark Wrote: https://twitter.com/BigFish3000/status/1456789786979614725/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1456789786979614725%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=
You seriously sent me to a Twitter account of someone called Big Fish in order to verify what you claimed? Are you kidding me!
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 12:28 PM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 12:07 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:53 AM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.
What evidence from the Treasury Dept. are you referring to?
You posted it, so I'll let you look for it. It was 4-5 months ago, give or take a month.
Bahahahahahahahahaha! Well alrighty then.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 11-08-2021
(11-08-2021, 12:42 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-08-2021, 12:28 PM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 12:07 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:53 AM)rothschild Wrote:(11-08-2021, 11:42 AM)Duchess Wrote: Who is presenting innuendo, rothschild? Maggot could have stated exactly what he disagreed with, he choose not to.
That "evidence" you cited from the Treasury Department a while back is a good example. It was nothing more than an unsubstantiated allegation.
The proof is in the pudding, which in this case would be criminal proceedings, something that Mueller didn't end up doing with respect to the big fish, and as you know -- or should -- Flynn was never told that he was under investigation during those interviews that were conducted, which is a huge Bozo no-no.
What evidence from the Treasury Dept. are you referring to?
You posted it, so I'll let you look for it. It was 4-5 months ago, give or take a month.
Bahahahahahahahahaha! Well alrighty then.
In the meantime, perhaps you should read the summary of IG Horowitz's report on the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation, because of your deep and profound concern for truth and democracy...
https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Maggot - 11-09-2021
USA Today article.
lies all of it
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - StephenCBanks - 04-13-2022
Thank you for post
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 05-29-2022
Investigative reporting on Russiagate from Grayzone -- which is decidedly leftist -- with former CIA officer Ray McGovern.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 05-31-2022
Durham just lost his case. The lawyer for Secretary Clinton and her 2016 campaign, Michael Sussmann, has been acquitted of lying to the FBI in connection with the trump/ Russia probe.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - Duchess - 10-19-2022
(10-29-2019, 08:27 AM)Maggot Wrote: The origins of the Russian collusion farce is now becoming a major force in the upcoming election John Durham is finaly getting to the bottom of how it all started so ..........The investigation continues.
This turned out to be a big, fat bust and Durham has mostly been laughed out of court. Stick a fork in him, he's done.
RE: RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 US ELECTION & SPIN-OFF INVESTIGATIONS - rothschild - 10-19-2022
Because the corporate media says so?