+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: 2012 ELECTION (/thread-5690.html)
RE: 2012 ELECTION - QueenBee - 05-16-2011
Gee, Donald Trump has decided NOT to run for president. Why am I not surprized at his change of mind.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Luke Warmwater - 05-16-2011
it would require him to provide a 'financial disclosure' which would undoubtedly cause him some embarrassment...wait, though...
he promised to do this when obama showed his birth cert but he hasn't. This fucker is a coward, and an ugly one at that...put some conditioner on you toupe you fucking ninny....
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Duchess - 05-16-2011
Most blowhards are cowards, all bark and no bite.
The only good thing that came out of all that is that he has been reduced to being a laughingstock in some circles & he knows it. Chances are we won't hear a peep out of him for a good six months or more.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Cynical Ninja - 05-16-2011
(05-16-2011, 01:07 PM)QueenBee Wrote: Gee, Donald Trump has decided NOT to run for president. Why am I not surprized at his change of mind.
Another blowhard full of shit.
All missile and no warhead.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Cynical Ninja - 05-16-2011
(05-16-2011, 01:25 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Most blowhards are cowards, all bark and no bite.
The only good thing that came out of all that is that he has been reduced to being a laughingstock in some circles & he knows it. Chances are we won't hear a peep out of him for a good six months or more.
The Whitehouse correspondents dinner was Trumps nadir, the entire room, (even the Fox news table) were laughing in his face and he just had to sit there like an idiot with his ridiculous headweave trembling with rage.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - WolfHouse - 05-16-2011
There was a new internet radio program today.....it was hysterical.
The guy dated every movie star of the fifties and hates Obama.
Funny stories and political discussion.
8am to 10am Eastern Standard Time
www.hotmix106.com
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Duchess - 05-22-2011
Has anyone heard that Ron Paul wants to abolish education funding altogether? I don't have time to investigate this, maybe later.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Persephone_Rizen - 05-22-2011
(05-22-2011, 06:37 AM)Duchess Wrote:
Has anyone heard that Ron Paul wants to abolish education funding altogether? I don't have time to investigate this, maybe later.
I will into it. that is crazy.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - sally - 05-22-2011
(05-22-2011, 06:37 AM)Duchess Wrote:
Has anyone heard that Ron Paul wants to abolish education funding altogether? I don't have time to investigate this, maybe later.
I don't think he wants to abolish education funding, he wants to abolish all federal involvement in education. Here is a little bit of what he said.
“First, the Constitution does not authorize the Department of Education, and the founders never envisioned the federal government dictating those education policies.
Second, it is a huge bureaucracy that squanders our money. We send billions of dollars to Washington and get back less than we sent. The money would be much better off left in states and local communities rather than being squandered in Washington.
Finally, I think that the smallest level of government possible best performs education. Teachers, parents, and local community leaders should be making decisions about exactly how our children should be taught, not Washington bureaucrats.
The Department of Education has given us No Child Left Behind, massive unfunded mandates, indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medication of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should get rid of all of that and get those choices back in the hands of the people.”
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Persephone_Rizen - 05-22-2011
Thank goodness Ron Paul is not that fanatical Duchess, but he is close.
http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Education.htm
He does want to get rid of the Department of Education. And he wants to encourage private school tax write-offs. He doesn't care for public schools getting government money for arts either.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - IMaDick - 05-22-2011
Less Government involvement is always better for the local communities.
We still have to have tax levies in order for our schools to function, it's a good idea to keep our money in the states and communities where your kids go to school.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Maggot - 05-22-2011
The Feds put a money gun to every states head. There is not much that can be done about it sadly.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Persephone_Rizen - 05-22-2011
I agree Maggot. One day we will look back and laugh at this madness, this onslaught of selfishness that had all brawn and no brains. no brains or vision for the future at all.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Duchess - 05-22-2011
(05-22-2011, 11:39 AM)Persephone_Rizen Wrote: I will into it. that is crazy.
(05-22-2011, 11:47 AM)sally Wrote: I don't think he wants to abolish education funding, he wants to abolish all federal involvement in education. Here is a little bit of what he said.
Thank you both!
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Maggot - 05-22-2011
Ron Paul has a ton of common sense. I like his abolish the Fed idea.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Cracker - 05-22-2011
(05-22-2011, 11:47 AM)Persephone_Rizen Wrote: Thank goodness Ron Paul is not that fanatical Duchess, but he is close.
http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Education.htm
He does want to get rid of the Department of Education. And he wants to encourage private school tax write-offs. He doesn't care for public schools getting government money for arts either.
The Feds contribute very little to public school education (about 10%) but the legislation they impose, and don't fund, costs schools billions and billions of dollars.
Arts should be funded from private sources.
We need to get out of this fucking hole. Schools would do fine living off state and local funding IF the Feds stayed the eff out of it.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Adub - 05-22-2011
My position in my local school district is federally funded. It was a special grant. Lasted two years and now poof it is gone. Before that, I had a position with a special state funded program that was cut due to funding. I started out working in the mainstream public schools, but found that the alternative programs pay more. And the class sizes are considerably smaller. More money, less students. After a relaxing summer off... I will be once again be enjoying a federally funded program for at-risk students.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Duchess - 06-02-2011
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney formally entered the race for the Republican presidential nomination Thursday with a blast at President Barack Obama's economic leadership and a claim that his business acumen makes him uniquely qualified for the Oval Office.
I agree with that statement.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - username - 06-02-2011
I don't think running a country is at all like running a business. In a business, there's typically a boss and he/she ultimately makes the decisions.
Imagine if every time Bill Gates wanted to make a decision at MicroSoft, he largely had to go out and get the employees to vote on his decision (or vote to hire people that would carry out his decisions). Anyway, bad analogy but you get my point. I think business acumen is handy but it's not a major factor for me.
RE: 2012 ELECTION - Duchess - 06-02-2011
We are going to disagree on this. I think we should be run like a business. We need someone who knows how to manage money & a definite bottom line.