Chili - beans or no beans? - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Funny Shit & Good Shit (https://mockforums.net/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: SOUP CHICKEN KITCHEN (https://mockforums.net/forum-26.html) +--- Thread: Chili - beans or no beans? (/thread-6774.html) |
RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Duchess - 10-29-2011 She has a bossy demeanor so I was trying to jerk her chain when I said nothing is serious in here. There is room for all kinds of conversation, from the serious to the mundane to the often times ridiculous. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - IMaDick - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 04:38 PM)username Wrote:(10-29-2011, 03:07 PM)IMaDick Wrote: For tax purposes chillis are classified as a vegetable, and for reasons that go beyond your and OP's understanding in the southwest chilis are considered a vegetable when served with a meal or as a meal. nope. you're wrong as usual. They are actully classified as both a fruit and a vegetable. see what just a few minutes could have done for you? by the way you will always get the wet side of the bed. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Lady Cop - 10-29-2011 this thread has persuaded me that Dickie is also a fruit and a vegetable. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - IMaDick - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 05:07 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: this thread has persuaded me that Dickie is also a fruit and a vegetable. You're just trying to help. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Cracker - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 04:53 PM)Duchess Wrote: I noticed that, too. I try to like her, but then she says some stupid shit and I remember what a tard she is. It's okay, though, because I think she likes herself a little too much. Which means she's fat and let herself go... Cracker knows these things. (10-29-2011, 03:31 PM)Harvest Moon Wrote: I am very much into cooking and I'm pretty damn good at traditional US cooking, many US regional variations, and many international cuisines. I have also studied food history. So feel free to ask away if you have any questions about basic cooking or the history behind the food we eat. Is there something we can feed you to shut you tf up? You quote pre-school songs and think we all don't want to choke you. That's all I need to know for now. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Harvest Moon - 10-29-2011 It's very unfortunate that some people can't see the complexity in seemingly simple things. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Cracker - 10-29-2011 I already have a source for food history: http://www.foodtimeline.org/ I took science and math in college instead. You may not want to challenge what I know. I just know stuff without everyone else having to know that I know it, except when they pay me to tell people. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Duchess - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 07:00 PM)Harvest Moon Wrote: It's very unfortunate that some people can't see the complexity in seemingly simple things. I can...that's why I don't do much cooking. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Harvest Moon - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 07:13 PM)Cracker Wrote: I just know stuff without everyone else having to know that I know it, except when they pay me to tell people. Same here... RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Harvest Moon - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 04:53 PM)Duchess Wrote: Who is She? Or are "we" just a little bit passive aggressive? RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Harvest Moon - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 05:07 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: this thread has persuaded me that Dickie is also a fruit and a vegetable. A perfect quote! Can I make it part of my signature? RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Lady Cop - 10-29-2011 there will be royalties involved. but OK. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Harvest Moon - 10-29-2011 Done! Thanks LC for the use of your words... RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Lady Cop - 10-29-2011 i think copyright may be more applicable than tm. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - sally - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 03:31 PM)Harvest Moon Wrote:(10-28-2011, 10:37 PM)sally Wrote: Real chili does not have tomatoes in it as I stated earlier in this thread. The color and texture is from combining the meat with chili powder, peppers and other seasonings with a liquid such as beer or broth and allowing it to reduce slowly and develop flavor. It's the same technique as a traditional Hungarian paprikash. Didn't you fuckers ever watch the great chili cook off on food network? Goulash is a spicy thin soup made with meat and vegetables and served with galuska which is pretty much the same as German spaetzle . It's not the thick stew served over noodles that most Americans associate it with, that is actually called perkot (sp) in Hungarian. Paprikash is also served with galuska, but it uses the same technique as chili in the way that you add powdered spices and liquid while reducing it. I think I got it right anyway, I'd have to ask my dickhead Hungarian husband to make sure. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - IMaDick - 10-29-2011 You don't have to be hungarian to cook goulash. It's something we had as kids and I still make it once in awhile. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Cracker - 10-29-2011 (10-29-2011, 07:47 PM)Harvest Moon Wrote:(10-29-2011, 07:13 PM)Cracker Wrote: I just know stuff without everyone else having to know that I know it, except when they pay me to tell people. Uhhh, no. Not the same. I don't make serious offers to educate these GROWN PEOPLE I don't even know. Not Cracker: "I have a serious and relevant background in the sciences. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about anything because I understand the complexities of the natural world in an historical and technological context." You are an obnoxious female that quotes lines from emergent reader's texts who assumes we will all take you seriously because you are a pushy lady that takes an overt interest in food. NEWSFLASH: All chubbies do. Except the lazy ones that have an SUV full of empty McDonald's bags. Who the fuck married you? I only have to deal with you on a limited basis and you get on my fucking Internet nerves. He must also be an expert on something (or everything). You tried to be uppity about cooking, photography, people going to eat with their kids, and child molesters. If you are elderly, I apologize. If you aren't, you are insufferable. Basically, I wouldn't hump you. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - IMaDick - 10-30-2011 (10-29-2011, 07:00 PM)Harvest Moon Wrote: It's very unfortunate that some people can't see the complexity in seemingly simple things. Speaking of whack jobs. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - Duchess - 10-30-2011 I forgot she was the one who said we wouldn't have an appreciation for her daughter's photographs. Hmmmph. RE: Chili - beans or no beans? - sally - 10-30-2011 (10-29-2011, 08:59 PM)IMaDick Wrote: You don't have to be hungarian to cook goulash. Really, I didn't know that, and to think all these years I've been scared to cook goulash because I'm not Hungarian. I also never cook Chinese food because I'm not a China man. |