HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Printable Version +- Mock (https://mockforums.net) +-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html) +--- Thread: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT (/thread-9358.html) |
RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Maggot - 09-13-2015 (12-03-2012, 05:44 PM)Maggot Wrote: She's gonna need a midget in a clown car following her with a shovel to pick up poop by then. Huma is in the clown car. And have you ever tried to catch a leopard frog? They are slippery and quick, I will give HRC that. She has always been good at slippery and quick. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Maggot - 09-13-2015 I don't think HRC is as worried about her e-mails containing government secrets as she is about what people will find out how she really feels about the American public once all the e-mails are released. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Carsman - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 04:30 AM)Duchess Wrote:(09-12-2015, 10:15 PM)Carsman Wrote: Can't back it up, it was deleted! Things may be able to be resolved. This info in the news, this morning. The company that managed the Democratic frontrunner's private email server says it has no knowledge that the server was entirely erased. 'The server wasn't wiped' RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Duchess - 09-13-2015 So? RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Carsman - 09-13-2015 So ? So maybe the deleted emails can be retrieved! If they can be, it may help her, or hinder her. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Duchess - 09-13-2015 So many of you conveniently forget that she had every right to delete emails and did nothing wrong by doing so. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Carsman - 09-13-2015 Clearing up the mess that is already out there, can only help her cause? (Right or wrong, fix it!) RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 04:30 AM)Duchess Wrote:(09-12-2015, 10:15 PM)Carsman Wrote: Can't back it up, it was deleted! So if a cop goes into a house and it stinks of pot and the resident is in the bathroom and he hears the toilet flush you don't think he was flushing the pot? Same thing here. Something stinks and she flushed it away. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 (09-12-2015, 09:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(09-12-2015, 08:15 PM)F.U. Wrote: How can there be any proof weather or not it was important if the dumb ass deleted the proof? Come on, you have to understand that. Geeeese, HotD, that is the nicest way I have ever ben called stupid. Actually I have ben called for jury before, several times and they boot me right away. As soon as I say I think the court systems are a joke, I am out the door. By the way, I think you would make a great lawyer. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Duchess - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:07 AM)F.U. Wrote: So if a cop goes into a house and it stinks of pot and the resident is in the bathroom and he hears the toilet flush you don't think he was flushing the pot? Hahaha! You're grasping. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:13 AM)Duchess Wrote:(09-13-2015, 11:07 AM)F.U. Wrote: So if a cop goes into a house and it stinks of pot and the resident is in the bathroom and he hears the toilet flush you don't think he was flushing the pot? Not at all. I just look at things differently. I always ask why. Why did she mix work with home and why was she stupid enough to think people wouldn't question her flushing the evidence. That's it. WHY? RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Duchess - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:16 AM)F.U. Wrote: why was she stupid enough to think people wouldn't question her flushing the evidence. That's it. WHY? What's the evidence? Strangely not one single person can answer that. Can you? Who told you there is "evidence"? Evidence of what? RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 How many times does it need to be said. SHE FLUSHED EVERYTHING. Now we don't know what she had. If it was nothing she sure got herself in a pickle and made herself look bad over nothing. ETA and that is why I ask WHY. Why would someone that is looked at as being so smart , so stooped? She had to know this would bring up questions. Why would she give the people that hate her ammo to fire back at her? Why WHY WHY ? RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Duchess - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:21 AM)F.U. Wrote: we don't know what she had. Exactly and yet you present your "evidence" as fact. Pfft. Her personal email isn't your business. You're not entitled to know one damn thing about it. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 We are entitled to ask questions as to why she deleted that email. Once she was dumb enough to mix work and home life those personal emails were no longer personal. They were work and should not have ben flushed and are open to us asking about them and seeing them. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - HairOfTheDog - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:12 AM)F.U. Wrote: Geeeese, HotD, that is the nicest way I have ever ben called stupid. If I wanted to call you stupid, I would do so directly. That wasn't what I did. I pointed out that since we're not in court, your "guilty til proven innocent" mindset is not a problem. You and I don't have similar thought processes or styles, F.U., obviously. I'm not asking you to adopt mine and, I won't be adopting yours. However, I sometimes change my opinion based on compelling arguments or facts. Your reasons for believing that Hillary Clinton must be guilty of something for which she hasn't been charged aren't based on facts and aren't compelling to me. But, I don't have any problem with a difference in view points. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 I just realized the issue here. One side says oh its ok, she said it is so. She said they were personal not work. The other side is saying, BS, I don't believe you, I want proof. Its just a case of Prove it. RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Carsman - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:27 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:(09-13-2015, 11:12 AM)F.U. Wrote: Geeeese, HotD, that is the nicest way I have ever ben called stupid. Why yes it is. Stubbornness, not so much! RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - Duchess - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:26 AM)F.U. Wrote: They were work and should not have ben flushed and are open to us asking about them and seeing them. YOU are saying they are work. Holy shit, what part of that are you not getting? That is YOUR thought (and others like you of course.) RE: HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT - F.U. - 09-13-2015 (09-13-2015, 11:35 AM)Duchess Wrote:(09-13-2015, 11:26 AM)F.U. Wrote: They were work and should not have ben flushed and are open to us asking about them and seeing them. You cant cut that one part of my post out Duch. They became work when she mixed the two. I just know that if they were nothing she sure shot herself in the foot over nothing. This stupidity just might cost her the shot at being the first US president that slept with another US president [ I seen that yesterday and just had to use it, lol] . ETA . . . and YOU are saying they are not [what part of this aren't you getting?], WHY? Because she said so? You have to ask WHY WHY WHY? |