08-16-2018, 12:19 PM
(08-15-2018, 11:19 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: Asylum seekers have a legitimate right to enter your country and ask for freedom. Illegal immigrants however do not. And certainly neither group have in no way done anything that credits abuse of their human rights, abuse of the system and vilification.
The job of any government, is to assess and process, if they fall into the category of illegal immigrant then you deport. However, if they are legitimate asylum seekers you do not treat them and label them as illegal immigrants. The two are completely separate.
I have done extensive research and have been published in a medical journal on this subject. Crash has read it. He is an accomplished academic.
If you chose to hate because of your uniformed educated view then that is your decision to live your life like a moron. But for God's sake, shut the fuck up. You have no idea what you are talking about.
A country has the sovereign right to accept or reject ANYONE.
Now to put this in context, say a billion people suddenly swarmed on a country claiming asylum, the country has EVERY right simply to ignore applications and to turn them away regardless of their "rights"
They are not citizens of that country. Accepting any asylum seeker is a generous offer and a charitable and humanitarian endeavour but it is NOT a right and the country doesn't have to do a bloody thing and pretending otherwise is silly.
I do believe in multiculturalism and with assimilation. Someone going to a host country needs to want to move there and obey the laws and seek to integrate themselves into the country's culture and values. They need to accept the country they are moving to has different mores and values from that which they left.
But I think when a country is accepting and diverse, it is necessarily better. Controlled migration is good for a country.