Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION
Author Message
Maggot Offline
Supermod
*****

Posts: 25,957
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #15
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

Whenever I see "show me your erection" and Zero as the last poster I get all kinds of pins and needles in my legs, like I should just run or something.






You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
07-10-2014 09:14 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

ZEROSPHERES Offline
Geschlechtslos
*

Posts: 3,015
Joined: Feb 2011
Post: #16
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

Maggot knows clearly what I want to post but I had to use words instead.









[Image: giphy.gif]
07-10-2014 09:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Maggot Offline
Supermod
*****

Posts: 25,957
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #17
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 09:24 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote:  Maggot knows clearly what I want to post but I had to use words instead.

I was with you until the "All guys would view it" thing.






You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
07-10-2014 09:26 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****

Posts: 25,051
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #18
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 08:02 PM)Cutz Wrote:  I know PA has the same laws, when I was 17 I dated a 15 yo. girl, and then I turned 18 (and just so you don't throw me the Sign_pervert card, she chased after me and was more sexually active than I had been.) I really don't see how they'd stick statutory stuff on him, but the pornography of a minor aspect is a possible pitfall. Unfair as it may be, sexting is still a blossoming legal area, and I could see how he'd be made an example. Still I think it'd be tough to convict him as an adult, so it'd be Juvie right?

Serious juvenile charges with long-term impacts though, you cradle-robber.

The teen is facing two felony charges, for possession of child pornography and manufacturing child pornography, which could lead not only to incarceration until he’s 21, but inclusion on the state sex offender data base for, possibly, the rest of his life.

Police have to investigate every complaint and take sex-related charges seriously -- I don't blame them for doing so. However, I have doubts that the PD would handle it the way the boy's attorney, Ms. Foster, was positioning it to the media unless there was more to the story. We'll see.

Anyway, Tonight the PD issued this press release with their side of the story.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Juvenile Sexting Case

On January 23, 2014 Manassas City Police was contacted by a parent of a 15 YOA female juvenile who was sent pornographic videos by a 17 YOA male suspect after repeatedly being told to stop. Upon further investigating the incident charges of manufacturing and distributing child pornography were brought against the 17 YOA male suspect on January 28, 2014 after consultation with the Commonwealth Attorney’s Office. The matter was set for trial on June 4th 2014 where charges were nolle prosqui by a Prince William County Assistant Commonwealth Attorney.

The circumstances on the decision to dismiss charges and bring forward new charges cannot be released at this time due to this incident being an active investigation and involving juveniles. New charges of manufacturing and distributing child pornography have been brought forward and a court date is pending.

It is not the policy of the Manassas City Police or the Commonwealth Attorney’s Office to authorize invasive search procedures of suspects in cases of this nature and no such procedures have been conducted in this case. Beyond that, neither the Police Department nor the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office discusses evidentiary matters prior to court hearings.


###

Adrienne E. Helms
Crime Prevention Specialist &
Public Information Officer
Manassas City Police Department
9518 Fairview Ave
Manassas, VA 20110


If the police were really overreaching and the boy is as innocent as his attorney would like us to believe, I'd not be surprised to see this go away as a result of the media spotlight and public outcry.

If the boy refused to stop sending what legally equates to child porn to a minor after being told repeatedly to cease, he could be in serious trouble. IMO.





07-10-2014 09:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****

Posts: 25,051
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #19
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 09:24 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote:  Maggot knows clearly what I want to post but I had to use words instead.

Smiley_emoticons_smile I'm imagining what you wanted to post being more interesting than the evidence being sought in this case.





07-10-2014 09:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

JsMom Away
Mockstress
**

Posts: 5,279
Joined: Feb 2011
Post: #20
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 02:12 PM)ramseycat Wrote:  I think the police and the girls parents are over reacting. Take your daughters phone away. Ground her. Deal with your child in a manner you feel is appropriate for the behavior. Speak with the boys parents so they can do the same. Involving the authorities and making an example out of this boy is not going to teach today's youth not to take and share pics of their privates.

You'd be surprised at how many teens sext. The authorities should spend their time tracking down real pedos.

Agree





07-10-2014 10:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

crash Offline
Mock Elder
***

Posts: 5,195
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #21
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 09:52 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:  
(07-10-2014 09:24 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote:  Maggot knows clearly what I want to post but I had to use words instead.

Smiley_emoticons_smile I'm imagining what you wanted to post being more interesting than the evidence being sought in this case.

I have no interest in what Zero wanted to post; the only one I worry about is mine. But I'm interested as to why Zero felt she couldn't post it..

Are there really people in Mock that would be genuinely offended by seeing an erection? I thought nearly everyone here was mature enough to go whoopee, it's a dick, moving on..

Would people really feel the need to carry on with a bit of faux rage 'Why are you posting that, I don't want to see that shit' carry on?

Or is there some legal loop in which Mock can't have any images that are considered porno?

Meh..can't believe I cared enough to type those sentences. I thought the consensus on Mock was that women don't like dick pics anyway. Is Zero the exception to the rule? Or is Zero not a woman..

Smiley_emoticons_skeptisch





07-10-2014 11:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Midwest Spy Away
The Discerning Boob Lover
**

Posts: 9,571
Joined: Feb 2011
Post: #22
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

1. Jury still out on Zero's sex.

2. Dick pics are to women the same as tit pics would be to me (I'm guessing).

3. I think LC gave her (??) grief in the past about dong pics.

4. Ramsey's hoping you finally repost your member.





07-10-2014 11:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****

Posts: 25,051
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #23
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

I don't know if you're asking me or Zero, crash.

I've never weighed in on dick pics, which, for me, can ignite a very positive or a very negative reaction (or a "meh") -- depending on the context.

My comment that you quoted was speaking towards Zero's creativity in chopping pics, as opposed to the subject matter itself.

I'm assuming Zero knows that nudes can be posted in the private "Nudity" forum, but not here in the public discussion forum and that's why she wouldn't post an exposed penis (or a chopped one, image I mean!) in this thread. But, she can answer that question.





07-10-2014 11:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

ZEROSPHERES Offline
Geschlechtslos
*

Posts: 3,015
Joined: Feb 2011
Post: #24
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

LC did put me on notice with intent to ban me when I posted a covered penis gif. in the Members Only/ Stuff with Nudity  / Saturday Schlongie Kong thread. l removed it after that and when that elicited so much attention and questions to her about how awful and offensive it must have been, she reposted it as post #16 in that same thread.









[Image: giphy.gif]
07-11-2014 12:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Cutz Offline
Mocker
**

Posts: 1,758
Joined: May 2014
Post: #25
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 09:36 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:  Serious juvenile charges with long-term impacts though, you cradle-robber.
The teen is facing two felony charges, for possession of child pornography and manufacturing child pornography, which could lead not only to incarceration until he’s 21, but inclusion on the state sex offender data base for, possibly, the rest of his life.

If the boy refused to stop sending what legally equates to child porn to a minor after being told repeatedly to cease, he could be in serious trouble. IMO.
It'd make filling out job apps difficult, but I'm just saying at least there's maximum punishment that LE can dole out. My question is what exactly he was texting the girl. Because if they're calling it child pornography if it's just videos or pictures of he himself, then that's messed up, from a philosophical standpoint.

Either he's young and innocent and shouldn't be used in pornography, meaning he's too young and innocent to have committed a crime, or he's a felony committing young adult... meaning he's old enough to be in pornography. It's a technicality sure, but it's a real loophole in logical reasoning. Charging him with harassing a girl over the phone is one thing, charging him with making porn of himself is illogical.





07-11-2014 12:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

crash Offline
Mock Elder
***

Posts: 5,195
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #26
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-10-2014 11:38 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:  I don't know if you're asking me or Zero, crash.

Sorry, wasn't really a response to anyone in particular, more a wondering thing..





07-11-2014 01:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****

Posts: 25,051
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #27
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

Yeah, I see your points, Cutz. I'm speaking from a legal standpoint.

Virginia is one of a handful of states where the legal age of consent is 18 (the highest age of consent), which pertains to erotic images as well as physical interaction - AFAIK.

However, Virginia, like Georgia, does have a close-in-age exemption, also known as a "Romeo and Juliet law", to the legal age of consent. This provision allows partners who are close in age, or both under the Virginia age of consent, to engage in consensual sex without fear of prosecution under Virginia age of consent regulations.

"Consensual" could be a key factor and doesn't only have to apply to physical contact.

The warrants in this case have not been made available to the public, probably because both the complainant and the defendant are juveniles under Virginia law. The police are not giving details on the evidence they have in their possession in this active investigation and ongoing case.

All we know is what the boy's defense attorney has told the media, including the claim that the police want a picture of the juvenile's erect penis to compare against other evidence they have obtained (which the police publicly denied in tonight's press release).

Are the police spinning to cover their asses because they overreached and got a lot of public backlash? Or, has the defense lawyer creatively spun what went down in her client's favor and used the media to garner the kind of support for this boy that I'm seeing here. Either one's possible -- neither one is rare.

If the police were really just trying to make an example out of the boy and he sent only pics of himself to his then-girlfriend during their relationship, I think it should be dropped for the same reasons you cited.

On the other hand, if it turns out that police have evidence of this 17-year-old distributing other pornographic images that we don't yet know about to other parties (possibly including images of the 15-year-old ex-girlfriend and/or other minors) and he refused to desist, that's another matter for me. People obviously don't wake up at age 18 or 21 and decide they're old enough to start exploiting others sexually -- sometimes predatory and exploiting tendencies begin much earlier and get progressively worse if left unchecked.

Long story long, I need more evidence before I'm gonna condemn or defend either the police or the male teen.





07-11-2014 01:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Cutz Offline
Mocker
**

Posts: 1,758
Joined: May 2014
Post: #28
RE: SHOW ME YOUR ERECTION

(07-11-2014 01:11 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:  However, Virginia, like Georgia, does have a close-in-age exemption, also known as a "Romeo and Juliet law", to the legal age of consent. This provision allows partners who are close in age, or both under the Virginia age of consent, to engage in consensual sex without fear of prosecution under Virginia age of consent regulations.

"Consensual" could be a key factor and doesn't only have to apply to physical contact.

Long story long, I need more evidence before I'm gonna condemn or defend either the police or the male teen.
The LE statement says he was sending porn vids to the girl, and the parents contact them. I would totally understand a charge of 'providing pornographic material to a minor.' Consent or no, probably illegal, and not covered by the R&J intercourse law. Legality to have sex doesn't cover porn images and sexting. I doubt the R&J is blanket enough for that. I'd also understand charges of cyberstalking, harassment, or such charges dealing with the non-consent and her minor status.

What doesn't make sense to me, is that they jumped to the child porn angle. If it's vids of him cause he's 17 and a minor, it has nothing to do with the girl. They might as well charge him with statutorily raping himself. Wouldn't his guilt of making and dist. child porn (of himself) condemn her possession of child pornography? Just very grey if that's the case.

If it's vids of the two of them that he posted online or sent to friends, and LE just found out later in the investigation, it'd make more sense, but it has nothing to do with him harassing her. I wouldn't bury the lede that way if I were LE. Rather than say anything about the girl, I'd focus on the distribution, but they said nothing about that. The only distribution they mentioned was sending her vids.

You're right tho, in either case, more info is needed, and harder to procure in child cases I'm sure. To me tho, it just seems like they jumped straight to the worst charges they thought they could stick. I hope it's not the case, but just a gut reaction. I guess the "show me your penis!" defense ranks right up there with Cochran tho.





07-11-2014 03:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Post Reply