10-10-2018, 10:26 AM
(10-10-2018, 10:11 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I wasn't twisting his words around sal. I already acknowledged and explained what that sentence appeared to suggest, to me.
"Report the findings". Findings sounds to me like the results of the investigation, which were reported widely, not a child telling a parent or other adult about feeling violated.
And, I pointed out straight off that dozens of the girls told adults at the Olympic Committee, University, or their parents. That's when Mags said he blames the parents not the girls.
In any case, I don't think anything that happened with Nassar is comparable to the Kavanaugh allegations and aftermath (nor the Weinstein accusers).
Nope you are lying straight up and you were happy to imply he was a rape apologist or believed men should be able to molest children. You did not believe it but you wanted to virtue signal and pretend moral indignation.
You are a slimeball. Really repugnant.
Quick question. Did you give him the benefit of the doubt and ask whether he meant what you were pretending he meant or did you just decide to accuse, smear and say you had his words and your "interpretation" was fact? Why is that?
It is this kind of fervour and righteous indignation that has innocent men accused of all sorts. Look at how quickly and based on nothing you were prepared to smear Maggot as a rape apologist and supportive of child abuse.
OWN YOUR WORDS!