04-16-2018, 08:36 PM
You're the only person I've seen suggesting, seriously or facetiously, that any of those people are Russian spies Mags.
You're not the only person I've seen who appears obsessed with using Hillary Clinton as a diversion........it's weak and ineffective every time.
Anyhow, Sean Hannity makes $36 million a year, according to Forbes. He has access to teams of attorneys. No matter how you try to downplay it for partisan reasons, it's effin' weird that he is one of only three clients on Michael Cohen's roster.
Hannity now claims he asked Cohen for real estate advice once and gave him 10 bucks so the conversation would be considered covered by attorney-client privilege. If that's true, it's very weird that Cohen and Cohen's attorney fought so hard not to disclose Hannity as one of Cohen's clients because (a) who gives a fuck about that conversation?, and (b) Sean Hannity would not qualify as a 'client' if that was the extent of what Cohen did for him, as far as I can see. It doesn't make sense.
I think damn near everything collected from Cohen's offices and residence (by warrant) is going to be found uncovered by attorney-client privilege. It's looking like Cohen was almost exclusively a fixer for high-profile Republicans/Conservatives who got themselves in seedy jams rather than an attorney acting in a legal capacity.
You're not the only person I've seen who appears obsessed with using Hillary Clinton as a diversion........it's weak and ineffective every time.
Anyhow, Sean Hannity makes $36 million a year, according to Forbes. He has access to teams of attorneys. No matter how you try to downplay it for partisan reasons, it's effin' weird that he is one of only three clients on Michael Cohen's roster.
Hannity now claims he asked Cohen for real estate advice once and gave him 10 bucks so the conversation would be considered covered by attorney-client privilege. If that's true, it's very weird that Cohen and Cohen's attorney fought so hard not to disclose Hannity as one of Cohen's clients because (a) who gives a fuck about that conversation?, and (b) Sean Hannity would not qualify as a 'client' if that was the extent of what Cohen did for him, as far as I can see. It doesn't make sense.
I think damn near everything collected from Cohen's offices and residence (by warrant) is going to be found uncovered by attorney-client privilege. It's looking like Cohen was almost exclusively a fixer for high-profile Republicans/Conservatives who got themselves in seedy jams rather than an attorney acting in a legal capacity.