Pot Criminalization: Up in Smoke?

[IMaDick]

Dick is confusing democracy with anarchy. "No rules" is not the same thing as "civil rights protected by government." The very fact that he is allowed to go on the internet, announce he's a dick, and begin preaching anti-government diatribes defeats his ludicrous claims of oppressive dictatorship. The basic flaw in his reasoning, that there should be no government interference in the affairs of men, is the assumption that most people in situations with no consequences or repercussions WILL INDEPENDENTLY CHOOSE TO BEHAVE THEMSELVES and respect their neighbors' right to do the same. We all know this is not true. Hell, Dick himself had the opportunity to practice his stated belief of "mind your own bjsiness" in the debate over gay marriage and couldn't manage to keep his nose out of it. Man doesnt even have government ties or lawmaking duties, and STILL he felt entitled to tell others what to do.

I'm not singling Dick out, I'm just pointing out the folly of thinking any political party, system, or method of civilization will EVER be able to avoid dictating rules to the governed

and you're confusing tyranny with freedom.


Get a grip.

[James Madison]
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.