08-27-2015, 11:38 PM
I'm familiar with WND and their reader base, pappy. And I've read the NY Times piece referenced in the WND article that you linked.
I've also read the reports from the GOP-led Congressional Investigation and the statements from the CIA and the Obama Administration.
I don't dispute that we the people don't always get the full or true story when it comes to sensitive intel, nor do I claim to know for certain the role or level of authorized American involvement in the arms moving from Gaddafi, to the Libyan rebels, to Turkey, to Syrian rebels and al-Qaeda.
Unlike you, however, I don't claim to personally know for a fact things that I couldn't possibly know for a fact. Nor do I imply that someone has their head up their ass blah blah blah and then pose a bunch more questions rather than answer a direct question posed to me in response to something that I posted. That's lame.
Anyway, if you have facts to back up your assertions or just want to share your opinions and parroted Clinton conspiracy theories on Benghazi, China ties, the Muslim Brotherhood, Serbia, and any other topics, I'll look forward to reading them.
In the meantime, I'm not gonna go chasing down your sources in order to answer your questions regarding your innuendo, pappy. You're not that compelling or convincing. If you want us to know what you think and why, it's up to you to post it up yourself.
I've also read the reports from the GOP-led Congressional Investigation and the statements from the CIA and the Obama Administration.
I don't dispute that we the people don't always get the full or true story when it comes to sensitive intel, nor do I claim to know for certain the role or level of authorized American involvement in the arms moving from Gaddafi, to the Libyan rebels, to Turkey, to Syrian rebels and al-Qaeda.
Unlike you, however, I don't claim to personally know for a fact things that I couldn't possibly know for a fact. Nor do I imply that someone has their head up their ass blah blah blah and then pose a bunch more questions rather than answer a direct question posed to me in response to something that I posted. That's lame.
Anyway, if you have facts to back up your assertions or just want to share your opinions and parroted Clinton conspiracy theories on Benghazi, China ties, the Muslim Brotherhood, Serbia, and any other topics, I'll look forward to reading them.
In the meantime, I'm not gonna go chasing down your sources in order to answer your questions regarding your innuendo, pappy. You're not that compelling or convincing. If you want us to know what you think and why, it's up to you to post it up yourself.