10-31-2016, 01:49 PM
I understand your points, Tiki.
However, Clinton has never irresponsibly claimed that if she were elected president that she would prosecute and jail her opponent over his taxes, his lifestyle, or anything of the sort. Donald Trump, on the other hand, claims he would exceed his executive authority and do just that to Clinton if he were elected president, and he's got millions of his supporters lapping it up.
There is a big difference in judging someone's morality or ethics vs. calling someone who's not been convicted of a crime 'a criminal' and promising to 'lock her up!'. It's a false equivalency to compare the two, period.
However, Clinton has never irresponsibly claimed that if she were elected president that she would prosecute and jail her opponent over his taxes, his lifestyle, or anything of the sort. Donald Trump, on the other hand, claims he would exceed his executive authority and do just that to Clinton if he were elected president, and he's got millions of his supporters lapping it up.
There is a big difference in judging someone's morality or ethics vs. calling someone who's not been convicted of a crime 'a criminal' and promising to 'lock her up!'. It's a false equivalency to compare the two, period.