Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overly woke support group
#1


Reply
#2
Smiley_emoticons_smile

I love the ending on that bit. Tracey Ullman is such a sharp comedienne and a chameleon.

On a related note, today I read that Viggo Mortensen may be denied Academy Award consideration for his role in 'Green Book'.

The rationale: while doing press interviews, Mortensen was talking about race relations (the subject of the movie) and gave an example of how some things have changed by saying, "for example, no one says 'nigger' anymore".

Even though Mortensen hates the word and never uses it about or towards anyone, a bunch of overly woke people were highly offended that he didn't say 'n-word' instead of 'nigger'.

That's really fucking stupid in this context, in my opinion.
Reply
#3
Bunch of naggers if you ask me, right yo?
Reply
#4
If you're having a discussion about a word, I think you should be able to say the fucking word. Jesus Christ, it's a word. Fucking ridiculous.
Reply
#5
Word.
Reply
#6
(11-23-2018, 09:28 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Smiley_emoticons_smile

I love the ending on that bit. Tracey Ullman is such a sharp comedienne and a chameleon.

On a related note, today I read that Viggo Mortensen may be denied Academy Award consideration for his role in 'Green Book'.

The rationale: while doing press interviews, Mortensen was talking about race relations (the subject of the movie) and gave an example of how some things have changed by saying, "for example, no one says 'nigger' anymore".

Even though Mortensen hates the word and never uses it about or towards anyone, a bunch of overly woke people were highly offended that he didn't say 'n-word' instead of 'nigger'.

That's really fucking stupid in this context, in my opinion.

They are your people and speaking your language. You, of course, can laugh and say "Me? Haha, no they are caricatures and stereotypes and I am more grounded than that". But then you DID infer a member and mod on here was a supporter of child abuse and of being a rape apologist because he disagreed with your ideological position on something. You accused another of misogyny for disagreeing with you. You are further down the Leftist ideological rabbit hole than you realise.
(10-09-2018, 02:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: you believe men have the right and entitlement to molest and sexually assault minors and women.  

If HoTD doesn't agree with you politically you better humour her snowflake mentality or she will smear you for no good reason, like every other indoctrinated SJW. Liar and Slimeball. 
Reply
#7




The perfect attire for the overly woke support group. ')
Reply
#8
(11-23-2018, 10:53 PM)Fry Guy Wrote:
(11-23-2018, 09:28 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Smiley_emoticons_smile

I love the ending on that bit.  Tracey Ullman is such a sharp comedienne and a chameleon.

On a related note, today I read that Viggo Mortensen may be denied Academy Award consideration for his role in 'Green Book'.  

The rationale:  while doing press interviews, Mortensen was talking about race relations (the subject of the movie) and gave an example of how some things have changed by saying, "for example, no one says 'nigger' anymore".

Even though Mortensen hates the word and never uses it about or towards anyone,  a bunch of overly woke people were highly offended that he didn't say 'n-word' instead of 'nigger'.  

That's really fucking stupid in this context, in my opinion.

They are your people and speaking your language. You, of course, can laugh and say "Me? Haha, no they are caricatures and stereotypes and I am more grounded than that". But then you DID infer a member and mod on here was a supporter of child abuse and of being a rape apologist because he disagreed with your ideological position on something. You accused another of misogyny for disagreeing with you. You are further down the Leftist ideological rabbit hole than you realise.

Troll.
This is the funny shit forum, not the serious political SHIT forum.
Looks like you need the video more than anyone here.
To be a feminist is simply to believe that everybody should be treated equally, regardless of sex. It means you think that there should be equality of the sexes economically, socially, politically and personally. When you put it like that, it’s surely difficult for anybody to deny being a feminist. But for such a simple concept, it is often dramatically misunderstood.



Reply
#9
(11-24-2018, 03:23 AM)Love Child Wrote:
(11-23-2018, 10:53 PM)Fry Guy Wrote:
(11-23-2018, 09:28 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Smiley_emoticons_smile

I love the ending on that bit.  Tracey Ullman is such a sharp comedienne and a chameleon.

On a related note, today I read that Viggo Mortensen may be denied Academy Award consideration for his role in 'Green Book'.  

The rationale:  while doing press interviews, Mortensen was talking about race relations (the subject of the movie) and gave an example of how some things have changed by saying, "for example, no one says 'nigger' anymore".

Even though Mortensen hates the word and never uses it about or towards anyone,  a bunch of overly woke people were highly offended that he didn't say 'n-word' instead of 'nigger'.  

That's really fucking stupid in this context, in my opinion.

They are your people and speaking your language. You, of course, can laugh and say "Me? Haha, no they are caricatures and stereotypes and I am more grounded than that". But then you DID infer a member and mod on here was a supporter of child abuse and of being a rape apologist because he disagreed with your ideological position on something. You accused another of misogyny for disagreeing with you. You are further down the Leftist ideological rabbit hole than you realise.

Troll.
This is the funny shit forum, not the serious political SHIT forum.
Looks like you need the video more than anyone here.

But I do find her hypocrisy and dishonesty funny shit. I like calling her out on it.
(10-09-2018, 02:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: you believe men have the right and entitlement to molest and sexually assault minors and women.  

If HoTD doesn't agree with you politically you better humour her snowflake mentality or she will smear you for no good reason, like every other indoctrinated SJW. Liar and Slimeball. 
Reply
#10
I don't think FryGuy is a troll, Love Child.   If he is, he's a really shitty one.

I'm woke to the likelihood that that he's simply a miserable person who believes that obsessively repeating the same delusional bullshit, character diagnoses, and revisionist history over and over makes it true.  

The constant display of ignorant arrogance,  along with his habit of calling everyone who disagrees with him 'dishonest, disingenuous, hypocritical, *insert other personal insult here*...." has gone from sadly funny on occasion to consistently boring -- I don't find it stimulating or funny in any way.  

Anyhow, I'm glad that bullshit doesn't deter anyone from posting however and whatever they see fit and having fun in here.  While FryGuy's fixation with me personally is  more intense and creepy, it doesn't negatively affect or concern me.  I apathetically accept it for what it is.
Reply
#11
He's the anti-clang.
Reply
#12
(11-24-2018, 12:49 PM)BigMark Wrote: He's the anti-clang.
Thanks?
Reply
#13
(11-24-2018, 12:36 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I don't think FryGuy is a troll, Love Child.   If he is, he's a really shitty one.
I don't think you are either. Yes if your deliberate dishonesty that I have pointed out again and again IS trolling, it is terribly poor quality trolling
(11-24-2018, 12:36 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I'm woke to the likelihood that that he's simply a miserable person who believes that obsessively repeating the same delusional bullshit, character diagnoses, and revisionist history over and over makes it true.  
I have no doubt you are "woke"
If you are saying that I repeat things it sounds to me that I am consistent. Delusional bullshit is pure projection of your ideological narratives. Character Diagnoses? Of course I read, process and judge the personalities here. We mammals are pattern seekers and this is what everyone here does (what a terribly stupid accusation). Revisionist history? Well now this is quite a critique. Everything here is black and white and what I call you on and how I paint the past is rather easy to search, isn't it? Assuming that I am a history revisionist it should be all too easy to prove such a claim. You can't naturally and you are betting on anyone else not either asking for specificity or to search to see for themselves. Reasonable gambit, disingenuous but reasonable. I am not miserable, why on Earth would you think that?
(11-24-2018, 12:36 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: The constant display of ignorant arrogance,  along with his habit of calling everyone who disagrees with him 'dishonest, disingenuous, hypocritical, *insert other personal insult here*...." has gone from sadly funny on occasion to consistently boring -- I don't find it stimulating or funny in any way.  
You can of course call anything you like ignorance. Ironically it is a crude and ignorant practice to do so. I think you are dishonest and you think I am arrogant. I think we will both live. You will understand that I do not give a damn if you are moved or find me stimulating or funny. I see no reason why anyone would give a damn what you personally think of me or visa versa.
(11-24-2018, 12:36 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Anyhow, I'm glad that bullshit doesn't deter anyone from posting however and whatever they see fit and having fun in here.  While FryGuy's fixation with me personally is  more intense and creepy, it doesn't negatively affect or concern me.  I apathetically accept it for what it is.
I do not have a fixation on you and certainly not a "creepy" or "intense" fixation on anyone here. A collection of disembodied text associated to a strange dog avatar. There is not much to be attached to. It would be fucking stupid to suggest otherwise.
However that does not mean that I will not respond as I feel fit and though not fixated I am on a forum and as such, I will reply to topics with subject lines that interest me or that I have previously responded to and I will agree or disagree and react as I feel fit.
I have disagreed and critiqued a number of member's posts and I am not fixated on them either. I will continue to do so.

However, we know what this post is don't we? The efforts to patholgise me whilst pretending indifference and portraying yourself as a victim who is fixated on by a creep. Not quite inferring I am a supporter of child abuse or rape but same kind of ideological drive. Its pretty pathetic isn't it?
(10-09-2018, 02:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: you believe men have the right and entitlement to molest and sexually assault minors and women.  

If HoTD doesn't agree with you politically you better humour her snowflake mentality or she will smear you for no good reason, like every other indoctrinated SJW. Liar and Slimeball. 
Reply
#14
(11-23-2018, 09:08 PM)Rootilda Wrote:


How come I never tun into dopes like this in real life? Oh yeah, they are way to wimpy.
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#15
I read HOTD's totally awesome reply, then I got to Fry Guy

Oh Why

Sorry, I couldn't resist

Oh but I'm pissed!

I'm a white person

Standing up for a black person

brown person

every person

except that person

What am I going to do now?

I'm so woke now!

I see it all now!

I need glasses now

and a mega phone

and a helicopter drone

to tell everyone

about Black Lives

and Gay Rights

and Womens Rights

and I'm gonna tell everybody

that they are somebody

They aren't nobody

unless they're that body

I can't please everybody

I can't be everybody

But I can be This Body

So take it to the grave

we all die the same

return to the earth

Another year of birth

I get to breathe the air

Because I don't care

You act like you do

but you are doo doo

and your privilege

and your white cape

and you might hate

everybody

because nobody


shows love

but somebody

from above

that is what "they" say

filled with rage

locked in a cage

for your safety

for your comfort

But don't be black.
Reply
#16
Something wrong with being Black?
Reply
#17
Don't be black and have a gun.
To be a feminist is simply to believe that everybody should be treated equally, regardless of sex. It means you think that there should be equality of the sexes economically, socially, politically and personally. When you put it like that, it’s surely difficult for anybody to deny being a feminist. But for such a simple concept, it is often dramatically misunderstood.



Reply
#18
You can have your rights, you can own a gun, you can sit in a coffee shop, but if you are black, you may get treated differently, is what I was trying to say.
To be a feminist is simply to believe that everybody should be treated equally, regardless of sex. It means you think that there should be equality of the sexes economically, socially, politically and personally. When you put it like that, it’s surely difficult for anybody to deny being a feminist. But for such a simple concept, it is often dramatically misunderstood.



Reply
#19
Race is what you make of it.
Reply
#20
I don't even know what that means Big Mark. Care to elaborate?
To be a feminist is simply to believe that everybody should be treated equally, regardless of sex. It means you think that there should be equality of the sexes economically, socially, politically and personally. When you put it like that, it’s surely difficult for anybody to deny being a feminist. But for such a simple concept, it is often dramatically misunderstood.



Reply