Post: #43

I sometimes tune in to the Today show & I swear I see Matt Lauer visibly cringe when he is forced to speak about it.

Post: #44

(04-25-2011 02:08 PM)Lady Cop Wrote:  [b]OP what time GMT will all the hoohaa start on TV friday?

I saw that the E! channel will start at 4am. I'm not sure what time everything starts though.

Post: #45

Other than the wedding, exactly what is everyone expected to see?

I wouldn't be bored with seeing the behind the scenes stuff, that's always way more interesting than what the public is allowed to see.

Post: #46

count me as one of the non-billion viewers...I have more important things to do like changing the oil in my car or taking a dump...or both.

you're going to see a shitload of fugly hats...

Post: #47

I don't even know when it is, only that it's upcoming. That's not really my scene.

It must suck to live your life in a fish bowl.

Post: #48

(04-25-2011 02:46 PM)IMaDick Wrote:  

(04-24-2011 01:41 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:  Oh look! some of planes that couldn't handle the superior planes of the Luftwaffe during the British defeat of the Battle of Britain!

It's alright OP, many other countries sent their pilots to fly the planes thus ensuring a win for britain.

60 million dollars to get married, 30 million dollars of it from the pockets of the slaves of the socialist republic of the UK.

You know, I can't help but wonder how long it will take this couple to become productive enough for the people to regain their investment?

I would figure that the younger brother will be a bit put off when the happy couple have a son, you know the future king of england.

32 of the 60 million is being spent on security. What a huge spectacle and colossal waste of money. I bet if the happy couple had their way, they would have just eloped.

I don't see Harry as giving a shit about being King. He's a rebel.

Post: #49

(04-25-2011 02:46 PM)IMaDick Wrote:  

(04-24-2011 01:41 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:  Oh look! some of planes that couldn't handle the superior planes of the Luftwaffe during the British defeat of the Battle of Britain!

It's alright OP, many other countries sent their pilots to fly the planes thus ensuring a win for britain.

jesus fucking christ...why do you insist on bastardizing the facts I brought to this topic several weeks ago? No fucking countires sent their pilots to help Britain. These gung-ho mercenaries showed up and volunteered to fight the fight for their own personal reasons. The same type of volunteers showed up once the U.S. had air squadrons in europe...they were also accepted to participate in U.S. led attacks. Why turn away experienced killers with blood-lust? Britain won the battle on their own no matter how much you want to continue and twist it. For fucks sake, are you trying to obtain a job as a fauxsnooze story line writer?

Post: #50

Luke I guess you should take a look at the official records of those who fought and those who were lost in the battle, they are listed by country it should be real easy for you to figure out, hell they are even in alphabetical order.

Post: #51

about the beautiful horses~~

William and Kate's first journey as husband and wife will be escorted by nine of the coolest heads the Metropolitan Police has to offer - the force's famous grey horses.

But while the matter of invites has long been settled for human guests at the wedding, the animals of the Met's Grey Escort are still waiting to learn if they will have the honour of accompanying the royal couple's carriage.

The force has selected 11 horses with the calmest temperaments to escort the royal carriage from Westminster Abbey to Buckingham Palace after the wedding but only nine will actually step onto the Mall on the big day.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z1KckGM8zk

Post: #52

(04-26-2011 01:34 AM)IMaDick Wrote:  Luke I guess you should take a look at the official records of those who fought and those who were lost in the battle, they are listed by country it should be real easy for you to figure out, hell they are even in alphabetical order.

Post: #53

Interestingly enough, none of them are listed as mercenary volunteers.

It seems that the actual historical account differs from the view given by the resident liberal fools.

Quote: Luke wrote: These gung-ho mercenaries showed up and volunteered

This is very telling since mercenaries by definition are professional soldiers who are paid for their involvement.

anyone care to give the definition of Volunteers?


Using both in the same sentence in reference to the same people is moronic, they are polar opposites.

Post: #54

I will watch the wedding, it will be like the english version of the hills have eyes.

Post: #55

(04-26-2011 12:10 PM)IMaDick Wrote:  Interestingly enough, none of them are listed as mercenary volunteers.

It seems that the actual historical account differs from the view given by the resident liberal fools.

Quote: Luke wrote: These gung-ho mercenaries showed up and volunteered

This is very telling since mercenaries by definition are professional soldiers who are paid for their involvement.

anyone care to give the definition of Volunteers?

Using both in the same sentence in reference to the same people is moronic, they are polar opposites.

Post: #56

(04-26-2011 12:11 PM)IMaDick Wrote:  I will watch the wedding, it will be like the english version of the hills have eyes.

I have a funny feeling Kate Middleton is more attractive than the muzzled manatee you are married to.