Mock

(09-30-2018, 11:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]Not on the list is the third accuser, Michael Avenatti's client Julie Swetnick.  

Also not on the list are the former classmates (some of whom supported Kavanaugh's nomination) who have come forward to say that Kavanaugh lied under oath about the heavy extent of his drinking in college.

I don't really care if Kavanaugh drank like a fish back then, but I do care if he bald-face lied about it over and over under oath and if he still drinks heavily today.  I hope that's looked into.  

In 2016, Judge Kavanaugh wrote a case supporting the use of lie detectors in background checks.  I'd sure like to see him agree to take one in regards to the sexual assault allegations.  But, I bet he won't.

Ref:  https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politic...tt-n915061

The FBI must give a lie detector test to the Judge, if he refuses, he's admitting he has something to hide and knows he
won't pass! His accuser took one, so he must take one also to make things more level.

Passing a lie detector test will help his credability, and make him more believable.  If he doesn't take one, well . . . . . . .   

(09-30-2018, 11:33 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-30-2018, 11:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]Not on the list is the third accuser, Michael Avenatti's client Julie Swetnick.  

Also not on the list are the former classmates (some of whom supported Kavanaugh's nomination) who have come forward to say that Kavanaugh lied under oath about the heavy extent of his drinking in college.

I don't really care if Kavanaugh drank like a fish back then, but I do care if he bald-face lied about it over and over under oath and if he still drinks heavily today.  I hope that's looked into.  

In 2016, Judge Kavanaugh wrote a case supporting the use of lie detectors in background checks.  I'd sure like to see him agree to take one in regards to the sexual assault allegations.  But, I bet he won't.

Ref:  https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politic...tt-n915061

The FBI must give a lie detector test to the Judge, if he refuses, he's admitting he has something to hide and knows he
won't pass! His accuser took one, so he must take one also to make things more level.

Passing a lie detector will help his credability, and make him more believable.  If he doesn't take one, well . . . . . . .   

I think it would be a great idea. He has stated that he will do whatever he is told to do. He has so far. If they ask him to do this I am sure he will. However If he passes this. It will not "help his credibility" The same people that are screaming that he is a rapist and that Ford should be believed and why would she lie, will keep believing that he is not credible.

you are such an idiot, one of the reasons they agreed to delay the nomination is so he can go to trick lie detector school.

(09-30-2018, 11:45 PM)Fry Guy Wrote: [ -> ]I think it would be a great idea. He has stated that he will do whatever he is told to do. He has so far. If they ask him to do this I am sure he will. However If he passes this. It will not "help his credibility" The same people that are screaming that he is a rapist and that Ford should be believed and why would she lie, will keep believing that he is not credible.

Yeah, some people who are insisting that Kavanaugh's guilty of sexual assault won't change their minds if he agrees to take a polygraph test and passes it.  Just like some people who insist that he's not guilty of sexual assault won't change their minds if he agrees to take a polygraph test and fails it.

But, the results would still matter. The results of the lie detector test would be part of the background check report which will be used by senators to make the final  hiring decision.  

If  Kavanaugh agrees to take a polygraph test administered by the FBI and passes it, the Democratic senators won't be able to credibly write it off as meaningless because they've already hailed the fact that Ford passed a poly administered by a former FBI agent.  

For those senators currently on the fence, passing a polygraph test would likely be a big green light to vote for Kavanaugh.  And, failing one would likely be a big red light for not only the fence-sitters, but also some senators who are currently a 'yes' on Kavanaugh.

I don't believe Kavanaugh will take one for several reasons.  But I hope you're right and he does.

Yes, and to put my cards completely on the table, if he fails that would put me into the unsure about his innocence category. If he fails, my thought would be "He may still be innocent but why did he fails the lie detector rest. My confidence in him would falter.

So lie detector out the way, IF it IS true that this technique of smearing Republican with unproven sexual assault allegations JUST before they are to be voted on for higher office is becoming a tried and true tactic when the stakes are high (Thomas, Moore and Kavenaugh), AND if it is true that a man thus smeared passes lie detector tests, has alibis, calendars, no proof against him and the witnesses AGAINST him swear to there never being any such occasion as described, what is a man like that to do to restore his standing after such smear tactics?

Because as above this lie detector will not do it and even Thomas all these years later has the smear thrown in his face by Democrats. What will restore such a man from the basest of smear campaigns?

Yes Snowflake that would be an outstanding idea.

Just how far behind the ball are you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNAdj4GFDjQ&t=3s

(09-30-2018, 11:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]Not on the list is the third accuser, Michael Avenatti's client Julie Swetnick.  

Also not on the list are the former classmates (some of whom supported Kavanaugh's nomination) who have come forward to say that Kavanaugh lied under oath about the heavy extent of his drinking in college.

I don't really care if Kavanaugh drank like a fish back then, but I do care if he bald-face lied about it over and over under oath and if he still drinks heavily today.  I hope that's looked into.  

In 2016, Judge Kavanaugh wrote a case supporting the use of lie detectors in background checks.  I'd sure like to see him agree to take one in regards to the sexual assault allegations. But, I bet he won't.

Ref:  https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politic...tt-n915061

This is why Avenatti went from solid 1000% certain that Mark Judge and Brett Kavenaugh are rapists and part of a rape gang with someone prepared to come forward to crickets. He better hope and prey that Kavenaugh does not take him to the cleaners over this. I hope Brett Kavenaugh does. I hope that if he does, Michael Avenati will find himself unable to point away from himself or his strong words and accusations and not able to do anything but own the words.

This is the fourth or fifth account of a classmate of Kavanaugh's coming forward to contest Kavanaugh's claims and sworn testimony about his drinking.

Charles Ludington, a classmate of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at Yale University, will provide information to the FBI Monday, he confirmed to NBC News.

News of Ludington's involvement was first reported by The Washington Post, which said he planned to give a statement to the FBI at its field office in Raleigh, N.C., "detailing violent drunken behavior by Kavanaugh in college."

In a copy of his statement given to The Post, Ludington, a professor at North Carolina State University, described Kavanaugh as a "belligerent and aggressive" drunk.

"On one of the last occasions I purposely socialized with Brett, I witnessed him respond to a semi-hostile remark, not by defusing the situation, but by throwing his beer in the man's face and starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail," the statement said.

In his statement, Ludington wrote that "if he lied about his past actions on national television, and more especially while speaking under oath in front of the United States Senate, I believe those lies should have consequences."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme...ge-n915326

I was a party animal at 17 in fact I continued to be big on drinking and fighting and trying to chase girls well past 17. I settled down as most people do. I was maybe 22. Hell I had a house by 24 and married by 25, so what I did as a 17 year old boy is of no consequence. Did I drink in excess? Yes and so did EVERY boy and girl then so what? If anyone had issue with what I did then I would tell them to go fuck themselves.

It was the 80's, no cocaine?

(10-01-2018, 11:08 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]That's not what all this is about at this point. It's about his lies and the fact he is partisan, partisan by his own words. He isn't worthy to sit on the bench because of that. Hopefully he'll lose his federal position as well.

How so?

(10-01-2018, 11:26 AM)Fry Guy Wrote: [ -> ]How so?

Are you referring to my comment regarding him being partisan? He blamed his troubles on Democrats, even went so far as to say it was revenge on behalf on the Clinton's. He was political in his remarks.

(10-01-2018, 11:37 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]Kavenaugh is not just fighting the Feinstien smear campaign against a Trump appointee with democrat drones and carnival barkers for the Supreme court nomination he is fighting for his name and today I believe his name is more important than the nomination. Because the media and the talking heads love to hype anything that comes under their nose. The headlines are blasted with opinion pieces that really mean nothing. Hopefully the FBI with all their partisan thugs can get things squared away for once. All of the testimony was bereft of factual evidence and I believe that is why Feinstien waited to toss it in as a hail Mary. She new it was all non factual information and who knows Ford was probably raped during one of her drunken episodes she had quite a few of them, but I do not think it was Kasaniugh.  

You didn't listen to the testimony? If you had you would have heard Dr. Ford & Senator Feinstein address their conversation in regards to Dr. Ford asking Feinstein to respect her privacy.

I worry about you. I say that sincerely.