Mock

How is an election "free and fair" when some states weren't bothering to do signature verification for the mail-in ballots, had no proper chain of custody for the handling of these ballots, and poll observers were prevented from physically inspecting ballots?

This is the first one--June 9, 2022




2^nd hearing--June 13, 2022

(06-15-2022, 01:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]How is an election "free and fair" when some states weren't bothering to do signature verification for the mail-in ballots, had no proper chain of custody for the handling of these ballots, and poll observers were prevented from physically inspecting ballots?

Maybe someone will come along and go down the rabbit hole with you.

(06-15-2022, 01:52 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-15-2022, 01:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]How is an election "free and fair" when some states weren't bothering to do signature verification for the mail-in ballots, had no proper chain of custody for the handling of these ballots, and poll observers were prevented from physically inspecting ballots?

Maybe someone will come along and go down the rabbit hole with you.

Better a rabbit hole than the cesspit you live in.

Watching. Thanks.

Maggot, you might be interested in this footage.
*edit I copied it from youtube at 47 min in but it doesn't do that here. So just fast forward if you will.

It starts 47 min in

(06-15-2022, 08:30 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]Maggot, you might be interested in this footage.
*edit I copied it from youtube at 47 min in but it doesn't do that here. So just fast forward if you will.

It starts 47 min in

Anyone that watched that video who doesn’t think Donald is not to blame is short 2 cards from the deck!

I wonder what the resident libruls think would happen to these witnesses if they didn't tell the committee what it wants to hear. I can well imagine.

Yeah, Trump's a POS, but so is everyone on that committee. Liars and grifters all.

Witnesses, such as the officer that talked about getting trampled, if they hadn't recounted the events of that day-you think the committee would have threatened this person's life? Do you think these people are testifying under duress?

(06-15-2022, 11:22 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]Witnesses, such as the officer that talked about getting trampled, if they hadn't recounted the events of that day-you think the committee would have threatened this person's life? Do you think these people are testifying under duress?

Do you think that's who I'm referring to?

(06-15-2022, 08:55 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]Anyone that watched that video who doesn’t think Donald is not to blame is short 2 cards from the deck!

There are people in Mock who don't believe it OR think it is exaggerated in a way to make trump look bad.

Have you heard about Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, role in all of this? Her junky white ass needs to be sat down in front of this committee and deposed. Hopefully John Eastman will put the nails in that particular coffin.

Greg Jacob is VP Pence's former counsel, he has testified under oath before the J6 Committee that John Eastman told trump on January 4^th 2021 that the pressure campaign against Pence violated the law. It was against the law and trump continued nonetheless.

trump to Pence in an effort to get Pence to overturn the election results--"wouldn't it be almost cool to have that power". "I don't want to be your friend any more if you don't do this".

Holy fuckity fuck.

This will be the last political thing Cheney will ever do until she turns into a Dem as she should.

trump's man John Eastman pled the 5^th 100 times.

The hearings have been such a rousing success that NBC went to.............Golf after cutting in. LOL