(06-04-2016, 12:05 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]
I don't hate anyone for supporting Trump but I'll mock the hell out of those that do.
Hit me with your best shot.
There's not one damn thing you could possibly do to convince me you support that moron. It's not like you have shit for brains or some other mental defect that keeps you from understanding what that POS stands for.
(06-04-2016, 05:23 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] It's not like you have shit for brains or some other mental defect that keeps you from understanding what that POS stands for.[/i]
It's simple: America First.
Kinda like Kerry's "Let America be America Again".
Or "Black Lies Matter".
(06-03-2016, 10:39 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Like I said, he appeals to the lowest common denominator.
princess.
(06-03-2016, 11:06 PM)crash Wrote: [ -> ] (06-03-2016, 10:08 PM)F.U. Wrote: [ -> ]Since when did the rest of the world have a say in who runs our country? Hint, They don't, they are all just worried because Trump wont be a pussy like the last prez.
Last time I checked, deliverance, America was still a citizen of the world. Who runs your country affects the rest of us too. If America lived by your rule and didn't butt in with every other country in the world, like you don't want the world to butt into yours, there'd be far less wrong with the world
I agree, I wish we wouldn't worry about the rest of the trash around the globe. Fuckem, let them kill their self's off. I really don't care.
(06-04-2016, 12:05 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]
I don't hate anyone for supporting Trump but I'll mock the hell out of those that do.
You will when he gets voted in as our new president. Last time I looked around there are far more of the lowest common denominator type, as you call us, than there is of those know it all, believe everything the government/media spoon feeds you, type people. SOoooo if what you say is true there should be no problem getting enough of us to done go an vote Big D in.
(06-04-2016, 02:34 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: [ -> ] (06-04-2016, 12:05 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]I don't hate anyone for supporting Trump but I'll mock the hell out of those that do.
I won't hate them either, but I will be deeply concerned about their mental state.
How thoughtful of you to think about the mental stability of others.
Wow..4 posts in a row. Pity the rest of the people that have to deal with you today given half your mental capacity is spent..
(06-04-2016, 02:34 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: [ -> ] (06-04-2016, 12:05 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]I don't hate anyone for supporting Trump but I'll mock the hell out of those that do.
I won't hate them either, but I will be deeply concerned about their mental state.
The only persons mental state you should be worried about is your own. Crazy Lady.
(06-04-2016, 10:58 AM)FAHQTOO Wrote: [ -> ] (06-04-2016, 02:34 AM)aussiefriend Wrote: [ -> ] (06-04-2016, 12:05 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]I don't hate anyone for supporting Trump but I'll mock the hell out of those that do.
I won't hate them either, but I will be deeply concerned about their mental state.
The only persons mental state you should be worried about is your own. Crazy Lady.
And you are at the top of the list!
Trump won't see the white house, it's more likely he'll usher in the destruction of the Republican party as it exists and a new second party will take over. Most likely the freedom first crowd will flood over to the Libertarians.
It's the stupid and the bigoted I fear. See above. They do outnumber the reasonable by a large margin and can't be talked down. They will cause mayhem like what is happening in California, and there are plenty of stupid angry people on both sides. Should make for a nice bloody series of clashes.
The only "mayhem" in California is the paid protesters becoming unhinged. I ask who is the dangerous ones out there? The protesters running around beating on the voters or the people going to a rally. All I see is brownshirts trying to bully their ideas into peaceful people. They are inhumanly ignorant of any values and morals. Quite pitiful actually. And it shows the true intent of the liberal mind. Hillary is cackling and says nothing her silence is her flag of guilt.
Hillary Clinton has unequivocally denounced violence at rallies; violence by both Trump opponents and Trump supporters.
If there's some evidence that violent protesters are being paid by anti-Trump groups, I'd love to see it. It defies common sense that they'd help Trump like that.
Anyway............Hillary Clinton secured the endorsement of Michael Bloomberg's Everytown U.S.A. for Gun Safety yesterday.
With 3.5 million members, Bloomberg's (verified) billions of dollars, and a commitment to defeating Donald Trump, the group could really help Clinton in California and blue states.
Trump, who as a private citizen supported a ban on assault rifles, opposes a ban on assault rifles as a presidential candidate. He has the support of the N.R.A.
Hillary and Bernie are still neck and neck going into California's primary on Tuesday, but Clinton has scooped up late endorsements from the United Auto Workers union; the environmental group NRDC Action Fund, which has never endorsed a candidate before; the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus Leadership PAC; and even the Democratic Leader of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, a state Sanders won by a landslide.
Story:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/hi...z4AdOKmtog
(06-04-2016, 10:10 AM)crash Wrote: [ -> ]Wow..4 posts in a row. Pity the rest of the people that have to deal with you today given half your mental capacity is spent..
Wow, you counted to 4, I am impressed. Keep up the good work little buddy.
(06-04-2016, 08:29 AM)F.U. Wrote: [ -> ] princess.
You can call me Duchess, honey.
(06-04-2016, 01:22 PM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]Hillary is cackling and says nothing her silence is her flag of guilt.
I've seen her say several times that she doesn't sanction the violence at the rallies. This goes back to when it first started happening many months ago. If you like, I can dig up some examples. I would hate for you to think that I can't back up what I profess because I love you much, Maggottyboo.
I wonder if Laureate Education and Walden University be the "Trump U" scandal with Hillary?
For-profit education with State Department sanction and Bill as their pitchman.
As a Senator, didnt she oppose for-profit universities . . . along with my favorite Native American politician, Beth "ya ta heh" Warren?
Maggot, Your misappropriation of the term "Brown shirts" tells me you understand very little of what the originals did and stood for, and even less of what is happening today. In point of fact Brown shirts weren't mercenaries or paid protesters. They were zealots and militia members whose rabid support of a widely ridiculed political clown helped him rise to power and into a position he never would have gained without their aid and never should have had. Of course, most were extremely weak minded and stupid, and so were discarded once their clown candidate had access to real genuine military might. Historians point to the "night of broken glass" as their last point of relevance.
Now who, in this election, is widely considered a joke or clown candidate, is reviled and ridiculed by all thinking persons, but has managed to parlay his influence with the especially weak minded to push him higher than he deserves to be? It's okay if you can't figure out the answer on your own. That's how he likes it.
How the hell is that clown going to get through the debates with Hillary? I think there will be those who try to advise him and he is going to blow them off and do it his way.
This is the schedule -
First presidential debate: Monday, Sept. 26, 2016, at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio
Vice presidential debate: Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2016, at Longwood University in Farmville, Va.
Second presidential debate: Sunday, Oct. 9, 2016, at Washington University in St. Louis
Third presidential debate: Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016 at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Love her or hate her, Hillary is excellent at debating. She knows how to wait for the correct moment to pounce and allows her adversary time to make statements that are then easily proven to be (potentially) false.
She is a skilled politician.
Now, whether that is what our country needs at this time, I honestly don't know.
The alternative? I'm also unsure.