You don't believe anything unless it's what you want to hear. There was no hoax, Maggot. You put this on the very same page that said this:

A bipartisan US Senate report says the 2017 intel assessment about Russian interference in the 2016 US election was accurate. “The Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Community’s conclusions."

He had a knee jerk reaction seeing "Clinton" in a sentence.

(04-28-2020, 11:17 AM)Duchess Wrote: You don't believe anything unless it's what you want to hear. There was no hoax, Maggot. You put this on the very same page that said this:

A bipartisan US Senate report says the 2017 intel assessment about Russian interference in the 2016 US election was accurate. “The Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Community’s conclusions."

Oh I believe they tried to influence the election they do it all the time for every election this time they found a sap in the DNC to do their bidding and try to get Trump. Of course nobody on the left cared about that as long as Trump got blamed for things he didn't do why should they care? Especially after they instigated it.  

Much like Biden today getting accused of inappropriate advances, there is only one paper that says anything and that's the post. The media and the left are the same people. It's very different when a Republican is being accused though.

(04-28-2020, 11:19 AM)Rootilda Wrote: He had a knee jerk reaction seeing "Clinton" in a sentence.

Probably the same knee you jerk upright when you see Trumps name you retarded drooling monkey.  

Now THAT felt good!! 

The unredacted Mueller report that trump claims exonerated him was supposed to be turned over by Barr yesterday. They are fighting it, weird given it contains all the information that will exonerate trump. You'd think he'd want us all to see it. Right? 

the HOAX is being uncovered and guess what - they lied. I think I heard someone say that here. The media and both parties in Washington are out of control.

The hoax being destroyed by truth.

Tucker Carlson is not a reliable source of news.

Deflection...........The truth is out and the culprits will pay. 

(05-09-2020, 11:14 AM)Rootilda Wrote: Tucker Carlson is not a reliable source of news.

She's not the stupid one when it's you that apparently views Tucker Carlson as a legitimate news source.

(05-09-2020, 12:32 PM)Maggot Wrote: Deflection...........The truth is out and the culprits will pay. 

the damn is crumbling a drop at a time

1. Drip - Mueller Russian Collusion, Trump Vindicated 
2. Drip - IG Report, Framework 
3. Drip - FISA obtained illegally, FISA Court Review 
4. Drip - Impeachment, Trump Vindicated 
5. Drip - Flynn, Exonerated

when the damn breaks, the progressives are going to be drowned by truth.

it is still too early in the election cycle; 12 more weeks and the indictments will be coming.

(05-09-2020, 02:16 PM)Duchess Wrote: She's not the stupid one when it's you that apparently views Tucker Carlson as a legitimate news source.

]

seriously, seek professional help.

She needs to pull her head out of that sweet ass.

(04-28-2020, 11:17 AM)Duchess Wrote: You don't believe anything unless it's what you want to hear. There was no hoax, Maggot. You put this on the very same page that said this:

A bipartisan US Senate report says the 2017 intel assessment about Russian interference in the 2016 US election was accurate. “The Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Community’s conclusions."

I am sure this is a waste of my time because your world view bias has warped your perception to the point you need therapy, but here goes.

Read the truth for yourself:

Official declassified transcripts

After exhausting many avenues of inquiry, I have yet to find Flynn's actual "lie".  The quotation marks are for the purpose of indicating it was a plea bargain.  Perhaps there was no lie . . . just a plea to a lesser offense.

You know . . . like dropping multiple traffic offenses (reckless driving, suspended license, no insurance, no current registration) into a speeding ticket and failure to renew license.  Plead guilty to murder and we'll take the death penalty off the table and you'll be eligible for parole in 30 years.

It happens all the time.  People plead to crimes they didn't commit to avoid being prosecuted for crimes they did commit.

However, without the actual "lie", I have no idea what crime Flynn committed (or if he really did commit a crime).

It's very strange that NO reporter from ANY network has pressed for this information.  That to me is disturbing.  Not one.  Why? 

And to my knowledge, the judge was not requiring Flynn to allocute the specific misdeed (the "lie").

I'm surprised DOJ prosecutors didn't state, with specificity, "This is the factual event and here is the supporting documentation.  Here is what Flynn stated which is contrary to the factual event and supporting documentation. Ergo: this is the lie to the FBI that Flynn has plead guilty."

Pretty simple.  Unless there was no lie . . . there was something else.

I would then expect the DOJ prosecutors to state: "Flynn committed this/these act(s) and the government has irrefutable evidence to support these charges.  However, in the interest of justice, we have offered a plea of a lesser crime to defendant Flynn.  It is our position that this is a fair and just resolve to Flynn's behavior."  

If there was a crime concerning the phone call with Kislyak, the FBI has transcripts and it would be a simple matter to illuminate Flynn's lie(s) or at worst, treason.

If he lied to Mueller investigators, that, too, would be a very simple matter to publicly disclose.

I know that Mock members are diligent in fact-finding (often with a healthy dose of snark and opinion).  There is no doubt Flynn agreed to a plea bargain.  And the plea bargain was for a lie . . . or perhaps multiple lies.

I am asking if any member has concrete information, not speculation, of the lie or lies, by Flynn, to which he has pleaded guilty.

And yes . . . it's curious that Flynn's defense team hasn't released this information.

However, it is possible that there really never was a lie . . . just a plea to a lesser charge of a far greater unknown and undisclosed crime.

If that's the case, then shame on the FBI, the DOJ and Mueller for not crucifying him.  Where's the justice in that?

what a well thought out and written response without anger or hyperbole, you don't belong here.

Neither do you, you whinging bucket of guts.

I do believe he's holding Mockers to a higher standard than the President of the United States. How 'bout that shit.

Flynn was exonerated. He was railroaded by a corrupt regime. He lost quite a bit and still he stuck with his honest appraisal of the situation. I cannot blame him for what he did, agreeing with the "friendly interrogation" He cannot be expected to be a lawyer. That is what the people that went after him hoped, today the can of worms was opened and nobody really knows how many will squirm out of the can.


If they did nothing wrong they have nothing to fear...........right?