08-23-2018, 12:09 AM
Well I don't think that is true either. He has less staff and a much smaller budget. I dont think he necessarily made bad hiring decisions as such. Who was better Lewindowski or Manafort? That is the wrong way to look at it because how Trump was viewing roles and strategies was more fluid. People were there for specific roles and functions and when the strategy changed or the next phase of the election campaign upon him. He disposed of that person and replaced them with someone that could better meet new expected challenges.
It doesn't mean the other people were bas but just not required for the next phase. Doesn't mean he is tied to the hip with them nor that adter they have done what they were bought on to do, that they would be kept around. The fact too that they have experience or can discharge their duties well does not suddenly endorse them as bastions of morality or make them close friends or "good people"
I am wondering why.you try to conflate the two and for what purpose?
It doesn't mean the other people were bas but just not required for the next phase. Doesn't mean he is tied to the hip with them nor that adter they have done what they were bought on to do, that they would be kept around. The fact too that they have experience or can discharge their duties well does not suddenly endorse them as bastions of morality or make them close friends or "good people"
I am wondering why.you try to conflate the two and for what purpose?