08-24-2018, 08:04 AM
What do you imagine is good for America in relation to Russia and what do you think President Trump SHOULD have done and what Rand Paul should support?
BEFORE you answer I want you to consider:
In 2015 Russia invaded and annexed Crimea from Ukraine
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/12/world...raine.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opini...story.html
He sent fucking blankets and socks. THESE sources meet your standard?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
The next year Obama was President prior to Trump both winning the election and taking office. Russia hacked the election. What did Obama do?
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/us/po...rence.html
Yup "Cut it out". Impressive.
Trump was not in office for any of that. But what did he do any way?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...s-ukraine/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/javelin-mis...1514237429
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...21ad52bcd9
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/30/world...-list.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...5bbbfef09c
These facts credible?
Arming their enemies, kicking out the most diplomats ever and sanctions.
Worst puppet of Putin ever, am I right?
Now that said Russia HAS been punished by this and only a moron would imagine this has no effect. (Yes there are some so ideologically blind, they think he is a puppet despite this).
SO Trump has shown force BUT he HAS to still have a relationship with Putin and a war or cold war benefits no one. Putin is ALWAYS going to deny interference and has been punished already SO what is left? What is GOOD for America?
That is right, good old diplomacy. Thanks Trump and Paul for being entirely reasonable and rational about Russia. Right? No? He ought to have pulled out a gun and shot Putin? What then?
Maybe he should have just told him to "Cut it out". Nothing like double standards of expectations.
BEFORE you answer I want you to consider:
In 2015 Russia invaded and annexed Crimea from Ukraine
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/12/world...raine.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opini...story.html
He sent fucking blankets and socks. THESE sources meet your standard?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
The next year Obama was President prior to Trump both winning the election and taking office. Russia hacked the election. What did Obama do?
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/us/po...rence.html
Yup "Cut it out". Impressive.
Trump was not in office for any of that. But what did he do any way?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...s-ukraine/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/javelin-mis...1514237429
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...21ad52bcd9
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/30/world...-list.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat...5bbbfef09c
These facts credible?
Arming their enemies, kicking out the most diplomats ever and sanctions.
Worst puppet of Putin ever, am I right?
Now that said Russia HAS been punished by this and only a moron would imagine this has no effect. (Yes there are some so ideologically blind, they think he is a puppet despite this).
SO Trump has shown force BUT he HAS to still have a relationship with Putin and a war or cold war benefits no one. Putin is ALWAYS going to deny interference and has been punished already SO what is left? What is GOOD for America?
That is right, good old diplomacy. Thanks Trump and Paul for being entirely reasonable and rational about Russia. Right? No? He ought to have pulled out a gun and shot Putin? What then?
Maybe he should have just told him to "Cut it out". Nothing like double standards of expectations.