01-10-2014, 11:20 AM
Over the last few years, I've found myself at a philosophical intersection many times when it comes to US laws, regulations, etc...
On the one hand, I understand and support the founding fathers' vision of each state having sovereign rights, with limited federal intervention, and the concepts of the Articles of Confederation and the 10th Amendment.
The 10th Amendment reads:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
On the other hand, it's frustrating that there is no consistency between states when it comes to same sex marriage legality, marijuana legalization, gun laws, the death penalty, etc...
There is so much conflict between the laws of different states and, to a lesser extent, between state laws and federal laws. The Supreme Court has its hands full considering cases pertaining to the latter and, to me, it's not often clear from a Constitutional view where the power should lie - state or fed? I don't think that the Supremacy Clause, which the founding fathers included in anticipation of such state vs. fed conflicts, is all that definitive, myself.
Here's the Supremacy Clause to the Constitution:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
====================================================
Any opinions?
Is the Constitution adaptable to changing times and working as it should; with these conflicts and diversity being a testament to what the country was meant to be?
Or, is it time to tag some key issues as belonging at the federal level for the sake of national unity in the face of changing times and social norms?
P.s. I imagine similar challenges arise with any type of "union". There are likely hot topic differences and conflicts in laws between countries comprising the European Union and the United Kingdom, between the territories and states of Australia, between the provinces of Canada, etc... Interested in hearing opinions/experiences therein too, if anyone's interested in weighing in.
On the one hand, I understand and support the founding fathers' vision of each state having sovereign rights, with limited federal intervention, and the concepts of the Articles of Confederation and the 10th Amendment.
The 10th Amendment reads:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
On the other hand, it's frustrating that there is no consistency between states when it comes to same sex marriage legality, marijuana legalization, gun laws, the death penalty, etc...
There is so much conflict between the laws of different states and, to a lesser extent, between state laws and federal laws. The Supreme Court has its hands full considering cases pertaining to the latter and, to me, it's not often clear from a Constitutional view where the power should lie - state or fed? I don't think that the Supremacy Clause, which the founding fathers included in anticipation of such state vs. fed conflicts, is all that definitive, myself.
Here's the Supremacy Clause to the Constitution:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
====================================================
Any opinions?
Is the Constitution adaptable to changing times and working as it should; with these conflicts and diversity being a testament to what the country was meant to be?
Or, is it time to tag some key issues as belonging at the federal level for the sake of national unity in the face of changing times and social norms?
P.s. I imagine similar challenges arise with any type of "union". There are likely hot topic differences and conflicts in laws between countries comprising the European Union and the United Kingdom, between the territories and states of Australia, between the provinces of Canada, etc... Interested in hearing opinions/experiences therein too, if anyone's interested in weighing in.