+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (/thread-12806.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 02-02-2017
![[Image: duncecap1.jpg?w=474]](https://slipperyslopebox.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/duncecap1.jpg?w=474)
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 02-02-2017
I know there's no chance of fixing you, Biggie.
So, I just kinda accept you as you are.
Don't go changing (not that you have the ability or the will).
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 02-02-2017
I'm just trying to broaden your horizons, kinda like what your rear end is doing lately.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - aussiefriend - 02-02-2017
Hotd sometimes your posts are too long. Can i ask u try and make your point in a more condenced version? You do have valid points but i get lost in all the words. And worse than that F2 doesn't know how to quote properly and then the post can be roolly long. It's too much man can you dig it?
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 02-02-2017
I can dig it.
And, you can ask Aussie, but I post what I want to say.
If my posts are too long for you to read, that's fine. Don't read them.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 02-02-2017
(02-02-2017, 01:32 AM)BigMark Wrote: I'm just trying to broaden your horizons, kinda like what your rear end is doing lately.
It's not my rear end, it's more my hips. But I've made good progress since January 2nd and still working on it.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - aussiefriend - 02-02-2017
(02-02-2017, 02:04 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I can dig it.
And, you can ask Aussie, but I post what I want to say.
If my posts are too long for you to read, that's fine. Don't read them.
Dont be like that Hotd. You make strong valid points. But if you were doing an academic paper you have a word count. I want to hear what you have to say but its hard at first to read it on my phone. Im not getting any younger
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 02-02-2017
Wooo boy. Another day of provocative headlines. How 'bout that trump administration? Are we having fun yet?
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Maggot - 02-02-2017
Throwing mud at the wall and seeing what sticks. Go Go Trumpster!!
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - F.U. - 02-02-2017
Interesting video debunking the 3% figure about PP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtgqxvaV-8U
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Maggot - 02-02-2017
Obama care numbers are tremendously inflated also. They re-up automatically anyone that was on it previously. So every year it looks like quite a few are still on it.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 02-02-2017
The same people they want to let in would behead them if they had an abortion.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 02-02-2017
That anti-abortion video doesn't 'debunk' the 3% statistic by Planned Parenthood, it confirms it. Despite the anti-abortion rhetoric in the video, the producers don't claim that the 3% is false.
Those who oppose abortion just don't like that valid statistic and think it's misleading. It's not misleading to me, but I understand what "all services" means.
Anti-abortion activists or people like me who like statistics can use accurate/audited numbers published openly by PP to determine the percentage of abortions per visits, abortion as a percentage of patients, abortion as a percentage of pregnancy tests, etc. -- plenty of ways to legitimately come up with another statistic which increases the abortion percentage/ratio; just change the comparative base. No problem.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 02-02-2017
--1 in 8 women who visit PP end up getting an abortion (from the video).
--Abortion procedures themselves - not funded by government - make up 3% of all service line items registered by PP annually (from PP & independent audit).
--There were 323,999 abortions performed by PP in 2016, which is about 1⁄2 of the abortions performed in the U.S. and the lowest number since Roe v Wade was decided (from CDC, PP & independent audit).
--91.4% of abortions were performed at or less than the 13th week of gestation; of those 65.8% were performed at or less than the eighth week and the number of abortions and percentage of abortions per 1,000 women have been declining significantly since 1995 in the U.S. (per CDC annual reports).
^All accurate. And, of course, the opposing camps will each use the statistics and surrounding narrative/rhetoric which best serves their cause; nothing new. As long as the statistics chosen are accurate, I like viewing them all.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - F.U. - 02-02-2017
Damn, I would have bet a hundred bucks that you would make that comeback. Yes my wording should have ben attempting to debunk, but hey that's ok. I still think that killing one child every 97 seconds is crazy. I also don't think a preg test and a abortion should be looked at as equal numbers/procedures.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - F.U. - 02-02-2017
Just a thought, but for sake of arguing, lets say that 3% number is right. Why not restrict abortions to Rape cases, incest, or medical reasons and eliminate the I just don't want to have a baby part. If that is done it may cut that number in 1⁄2 . So why not save the 98.5% of PP and just get rid of that 1.5%? Wouldn't that be a better deal? You can still receive all the other services that PP offers. You just cant kill a baby just because you don't want it.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - HairOfTheDog - 02-02-2017
(02-02-2017, 11:42 AM)F.U. Wrote: Damn, I would have bet a hundred bucks that you would make that comeback. Yes my wording should have ben attempting to debunk, but hey that's ok. I still think that killing one child every 97 seconds is crazy. I also don't think a preg test and a abortion should be looked at as equal numbers/procedures.
Well, I like facts and objective perspective.
As I said, you pick the stats, language, and rhetoric that best supports your argument/belief, most people do and all almost all activists and politicians do.
Just like one accurate stat that anti-gun activists particularly like is that 3 people die of gunshot wounds per hour in the U.S. And, seven more people are shot but survive during that same hour.
The same kind of stat-picking applies to every controversial issue; nothing new.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 02-02-2017
(02-02-2017, 11:42 AM)F.U. Wrote: killing one child every 97 seconds is crazy
There's the problem right there, you're viewing some cells as children.
No one I know agrees with late term abortions.
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - F.U. - 02-02-2017
What do you consider Late Term?
RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 02-02-2017
(02-02-2017, 11:58 AM)F.U. Wrote: What do you consider Late Term?
When the fetus would be viable outside of the mother's body.