I know there's no chance of fixing you, Biggie.

So, I just kinda accept you as you are.

Don't go changing (not that you have the ability or the will).

I'm just trying to broaden your horizons, kinda like what your rear end is doing lately.

Hotd sometimes your posts are too long. Can i ask u try and make your point in a more condenced version? You do have valid points but i get lost in all the words. And worse than that F2 doesn't know how to quote properly and then the post can be roolly long. It's too much man can you dig it?

I can dig it.

And, you can ask Aussie, but I post what I want to say.

If my posts are too long for you to read, that's fine. Don't read them.

(02-02-2017, 01:32 AM)BigMark Wrote: I'm just trying to broaden your horizons, kinda like what your rear end is doing lately.

It's not my rear end, it's more my hips. But I've made good progress since January 2^nd and still working on it.

(02-02-2017, 02:04 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I can dig it.

And, you can ask Aussie, but I post what I want to say.

If my posts are too long for you to read, that's fine. Don't read them.

Dont be like that Hotd. You make strong valid points. But if you were doing an academic paper you have a word count. I want to hear what you have to say but its hard at first to read it on my phone. Im not getting any younger

Wooo boy. Another day of provocative headlines. How 'bout that trump administration? Are we having fun yet?

Throwing mud at the wall and seeing what sticks. Go Go Trumpster!!

Interesting video debunking the 3% figure about PP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtgqxvaV-8U

Obama care numbers are tremendously inflated also. They re-up automatically anyone that was on it previously. So every year it looks like quite a few are still on it.

The same people they want to let in would behead them if they had an abortion.

That anti-abortion video doesn't 'debunk' the 3% statistic by Planned Parenthood, it confirms it. Despite the anti-abortion rhetoric in the video, the producers don't claim that the 3% is false.

Those who oppose abortion just don't like that valid statistic and think it's misleading. It's not misleading to me, but I understand what "all services" means.

Anti-abortion activists or people like me who like statistics can use accurate/audited numbers published openly by PP to determine the percentage of abortions per visits, abortion as a percentage of patients, abortion as a percentage of pregnancy tests, etc. -- plenty of ways to legitimately come up with another statistic which increases the abortion percentage/ratio; just change the comparative base. No problem.

--1 in 8 women who visit PP end up getting an abortion (from the video).

--Abortion procedures themselves - not funded by government - make up 3% of all service line items registered by PP annually (from PP & independent audit).

--There were 323,999 abortions performed by PP in 2016, which is about ¹⁄₂ of the abortions performed in the U.S. and the lowest number since Roe v Wade was decided (from CDC, PP & independent audit).

--91.4% of abortions were performed at or less than the 13^th week of gestation; of those 65.8% were performed at or less than the eighth week and the number of abortions and percentage of abortions per 1,000 women have been declining significantly since 1995 in the U.S. (per CDC annual reports).

^All accurate. And, of course, the opposing camps will each use the statistics and surrounding narrative/rhetoric which best serves their cause; nothing new. As long as the statistics chosen are accurate, I like viewing them all.

Damn, I would have bet a hundred bucks that you would make that comeback. Yes my wording should have ben attempting to debunk, but hey that's ok. I still think that killing one child every 97 seconds is crazy. I also don't think a preg test and a abortion should be looked at as equal numbers/procedures.

Just a thought, but for sake of arguing, lets say that 3% number is right. Why not restrict abortions to Rape cases, incest, or medical reasons and eliminate the I just don't want to have a baby part. If that is done it may cut that number in ¹⁄₂ . So why not save the 98.5% of PP and just get rid of that 1.5%? Wouldn't that be a better deal? You can still receive all the other services that PP offers. You just cant kill a baby just because you don't want it.

(02-02-2017, 11:42 AM)F.U. Wrote: Damn, I would have bet a hundred bucks that you would make that comeback. Yes my wording should have ben attempting to debunk, but hey that's ok. I still think that killing one child every 97 seconds is crazy. I also don't think a preg test and a abortion should be looked at as equal numbers/procedures.

Well, I like facts and objective perspective.

As I said, you pick the stats, language, and rhetoric that best supports your argument/belief, most people do and all almost all activists and politicians do.

Just like one accurate stat that anti-gun activists particularly like is that 3 people die of gunshot wounds per hour in the U.S. And, seven more people are shot but survive during that same hour.

The same kind of stat-picking applies to every controversial issue; nothing new.

(02-02-2017, 11:42 AM)F.U. Wrote: killing one child every 97 seconds is crazy

There's the problem right there, you're viewing some cells as children.

No one I know agrees with late term abortions.

What do you consider Late Term?

(02-02-2017, 11:58 AM)F.U. Wrote: What do you consider Late Term?

When the fetus would be viable outside of the mother's body.