Mock
THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Printable Version

+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (/thread-12806.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 08-28-2023

...and her eye make-up always looks smudged in all the pix I've seen of her, like she's slept in it.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Carsman - 08-28-2023

[Image: t_500x300]


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - MirahM - 08-28-2023

I hear STormy DAniels is doing comedy now.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Clang McFly - 08-29-2023

(08-28-2023, 10:58 PM)MirahM Wrote: I hear STormy DAniels is doing comedy now.

I wonder how much of her material is tiny orange penis jokes?


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 08-29-2023

Well, she refers to him as Tiny. I just read her say that the day trump turned himself in to be arrested in Georgia and claimed to be 6'3" and 215 lbs. *snort laugh* 6'3" 215 lbs. 


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - sally - 08-29-2023

Well he is 6’3 isn’t he? And he does appear to have lost weight, probably from all the stress of having to go to court constantly. I think they’re trying to kill him.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - MirahM - 08-29-2023

Ooooh now the post I saw makes sense. Someone showed a picture of someone else who is 6'3" and 215 lbs. Now I know why.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 09-14-2023

trump appointed Judge Cannon released an order yesterday in the Mar-A-Largo case stating that trump had 3500 pages of classified documents in his possession. The number of pages trump was legally authorized to have after leaving office is zero.

Where are all the "but her emails" people? Helllooooo.   78


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BigMark - 09-14-2023

The number of pages trump was legally authorized to have after leaving office is zero.

Yeah, sure.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 09-14-2023

Presidents don't get to claim classified documents as their own and take them when they leave office. If you don't believe that, look it up for yourself. I don't know what else to tell you, but even you should understand that.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - MirahM - 09-14-2023

In my fb memories I had posted about Trump's response to the hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. Back when I used to post political stuff on FB!


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 09-14-2023

(09-14-2023, 07:12 AM)Duchess Wrote: Presidents don't get to claim classified documents as their own and take them when they leave office. If you don't believe that, look it up for yourself. I don't know what else to tell you, but even you should understand that.

It is my understanding that presidents are not bound by any formal procedure to declassify documents.  The onus is on Congress to specify, by legislation and with specificity, the method for presidential declassification of documents.


Alleging classified documents in his possession mean nothing to me.

It's the Presidential Records Retention Act that should be the basis for the charges against Trump.

The whole classified doc controversy is a red herring . . . unless someone can show otherwise that he violated some law prohibiting him to willy-nilly declassify docs.

Simply put:  Show me where he failed to follow a law regarding declassifying docs . . . because once declassified, they now belong to the public and therefore . . . no harm, no foul.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - Duchess - 09-14-2023

Oh fucking hell Tiki. I'm not arguing trump with you or any other moron who is going to support & defend that POS by playing devils advocate or just plain defending him, he is a trash human, you want to support him knock yourself out but I don't have to respect that stupid fucking opinion. I've pretty much had my fill of that shit and zero fucks left to give to anyone who thinks it's A okay for him to be put back into a position of power in America.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - rothschild - 09-14-2023

Maybe they should have indicted him for being a trash human being. hah


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 09-14-2023

(09-14-2023, 02:11 PM)Duchess Wrote: Oh fucking hell Tiki. I'm not arguing trump with you or any other moron who is going to support & defend that POS by playing devils advocate or just plain defending him, he is a trash human, you want to support him knock yourself out but I don't have to respect that stupid fucking opinion. I've pretty much had my fill of that shit and zero fucks left to give to anyone who thinks it's A okay for him to be put back into a position of power in America.

Geez . . . no reason to get so pissy!   hah

I'm NOT defending him nor am I endorsing that he should be president.

I believe and subscribe to current laws on the books.

My position is charge him with violating a law on the books . . . period.

If there's a POS law, then charge him with that!

I can only hope the prosecution has something more than "He's a POS and deserves punishment!" as their basis for prosecution.

I still stand by he likely violated the Presidential Records Act. . . . which IS codified law and . . . if violated . . . deserves prosecution.

Quit imagining I'm defending or endorsing Trump.  I'm defending existing laws . . . not banana republic pretend laws and imaginary offenses.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 09-19-2023

So . . . the FBI's civilian infiltrator for the January 6 coup . . . Ray Epps . . . was charged with disorderly conduct for his participation in the "Greatest Threat to Democracy" . . . a misdemeanor. 

He should be behind bars for his incitement, captured on video, urging the crowd to storm the Capital.

His inciting words were clear and specific . . . unlike Trump's alleged "dog whistle" command to his faithful.

Carlson was right about this prick.  He was a plant by the Feds.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - rothschild - 09-19-2023

Tin+foil+hat+smiley


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 09-19-2023

(09-19-2023, 09:15 PM)rothschild Wrote: Tin+foil+hat+smiley

hah

Didn't Duchess tell you to pound sand when you asked her to lookup Ray Epps, years ago?    

Yeah . . . Epps wasn't a Confidential Human Source.  That's according to FBI Director Wray's statement to Congress (even though Epps was a chapter leader of the Oath Keepers, of which the FBI had imbedded no fewer than 8 CHSs . . . according to the NYT).

And they had CHSs within the Proud Boys, too . . .  revealed during the trial discovery process, by the defendants.

Both groups (some members) are charged with Jan. 6 crimes and yet, once again according to Wray, the FBI had no credible info regarding violent activities, planned by either group, prior to the "insurrection", from these sources!  (At least that's what Wray stated in his testimony to Congress).

What's weird is, Wray testified (to Congress) that ANTIFA was an ideology, NOT an organization (as Trump alleged), immediately prior to the 2020 election.

So . . . if ANTIFA was NOT an organization, as stated by Wray, why were they using Proud Boys informants to provide information about ANTIFA chapters, to the Bureau?  Oh, yeah . . . BLM, too.  (Thanks again, NYT!)

More stooge lies and propaganda.


RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - rothschild - 09-20-2023

(09-19-2023, 10:39 PM)BlueTiki Wrote:
(09-19-2023, 09:15 PM)rothschild Wrote: Tin+foil+hat+smiley

hah

Didn't Duchess tell you to pound sand when you asked her to lookup Ray Epps, years ago?    

Yeah . . . Epps wasn't a Confidential Human Source.  That's according to FBI Director Wray's statement to Congress (even though Epps was a chapter leader of the Oath Keepers, of which the FBI had imbedded no fewer than 8 CHSs . . . according to the NYT).

And they had CHSs within the Proud Boys, too . . .  revealed during the trial discovery process, by the defendants.

Both groups (some members) are charged with Jan. 6 crimes and yet, once again according to Wray, the FBI had no credible info regarding violent activities, planned by either group, prior to the "insurrection", from these sources!  (At least that's what Wray stated in his testimony to Congress).

What's weird is, Wray testified (to Congress) that ANTIFA was an ideology, NOT an organization (as Trump alleged), immediately prior to the 2020 election.

So . . . if ANTIFA was NOT an organization, as stated by Wray, why were they using Proud Boys informants to provide information about ANTIFA chapters, to the Bureau?  Oh, yeah . . . BLM, too.  (Thanks again, NYT!)

More stooge lies and propaganda.

With everything Trump had gone through with the FBI, he goes and plays right into their hands. I think we can add him to the gullible stooge list at this point, and those who continue to support him.

And who in their right mind would want to replace him, knowing they would almost certainly be subjected to the same treatment? No one I can think of that isn't a "rump" Republican that knows his/her place in the "new normal".



RE: THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY - BlueTiki - 09-20-2023

hah

It was just an observation, reminiscent of the good ol' times during J. Edgar's tenure . . . and NOT about Trump or his disciples.

A minimal show-charge, to a known instigator and active participant of an insurrection, demonstrating the DOJ's commitment to bring all to justice who participated in the attempted coup.

Too bad Wray doesn't "drag" like Hoover.

He'd be immune from criticism.