...and her eye make-up always looks smudged in all the pix I've seen of her, like she's slept in it.

I hear STormy DAniels is doing comedy now.

(08-28-2023, 10:58 PM)MirahM Wrote: I hear STormy DAniels is doing comedy now.

I wonder how much of her material is tiny orange penis jokes?

Well, she refers to him as Tiny. I just read her say that the day trump turned himself in to be arrested in Georgia and claimed to be 6'3" and 215 lbs. *snort laugh* 6'3" 215 lbs. 

Well he is 6’3 isn’t he? And he does appear to have lost weight, probably from all the stress of having to go to court constantly. I think they’re trying to kill him.

Ooooh now the post I saw makes sense. Someone showed a picture of someone else who is 6'3" and 215 lbs. Now I know why.

trump appointed Judge Cannon released an order yesterday in the Mar-A-Largo case stating that trump had 3500 pages of classified documents in his possession. The number of pages trump was legally authorized to have after leaving office is zero.

Where are all the "but her emails" people? Helllooooo.  

The number of pages trump was legally authorized to have after leaving office is zero.

Yeah, sure.

Presidents don't get to claim classified documents as their own and take them when they leave office. If you don't believe that, look it up for yourself. I don't know what else to tell you, but even you should understand that.

In my fb memories I had posted about Trump's response to the hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. Back when I used to post political stuff on FB!

(09-14-2023, 07:12 AM)Duchess Wrote: Presidents don't get to claim classified documents as their own and take them when they leave office. If you don't believe that, look it up for yourself. I don't know what else to tell you, but even you should understand that.

It is my understanding that presidents are not bound by any formal procedure to declassify documents.  The onus is on Congress to specify, by legislation and with specificity, the method for presidential declassification of documents.

Alleging classified documents in his possession mean nothing to me.

It's the Presidential Records Retention Act that should be the basis for the charges against Trump.

The whole classified doc controversy is a red herring . . . unless someone can show otherwise that he violated some law prohibiting him to willy-nilly declassify docs.

Simply put:  Show me where he failed to follow a law regarding declassifying docs . . . because once declassified, they now belong to the public and therefore . . . no harm, no foul.

Oh fucking hell Tiki. I'm not arguing trump with you or any other moron who is going to support & defend that POS by playing devils advocate or just plain defending him, he is a trash human, you want to support him knock yourself out but I don't have to respect that stupid fucking opinion. I've pretty much had my fill of that shit and zero fucks left to give to anyone who thinks it's A okay for him to be put back into a position of power in America.

Maybe they should have indicted him for being a trash human being.

(09-14-2023, 02:11 PM)Duchess Wrote: Oh fucking hell Tiki. I'm not arguing trump with you or any other moron who is going to support & defend that POS by playing devils advocate or just plain defending him, he is a trash human, you want to support him knock yourself out but I don't have to respect that stupid fucking opinion. I've pretty much had my fill of that shit and zero fucks left to give to anyone who thinks it's A okay for him to be put back into a position of power in America.

Geez . . . no reason to get so pissy!  

I'm NOT defending him nor am I endorsing that he should be president.

I believe and subscribe to current laws on the books.

My position is charge him with violating a law on the books . . . period.

If there's a POS law, then charge him with that!

I can only hope the prosecution has something more than "He's a POS and deserves punishment!" as their basis for prosecution.

I still stand by he likely violated the Presidential Records Act. . . . which IS codified law and . . . if violated . . . deserves prosecution.

Quit imagining I'm defending or endorsing Trump.  I'm defending existing laws . . . not banana republic pretend laws and imaginary offenses.

So . . . the FBI's civilian infiltrator for the January 6 coup . . . Ray Epps . . . was charged with disorderly conduct for his participation in the "Greatest Threat to Democracy" . . . a misdemeanor. 

He should be behind bars for his incitement, captured on video, urging the crowd to storm the Capital.

His inciting words were clear and specific . . . unlike Trump's alleged "dog whistle" command to his faithful.

Carlson was right about this prick.  He was a plant by the Feds.

(09-19-2023, 09:15 PM)rothschild Wrote:

Didn't Duchess tell you to pound sand when you asked her to lookup Ray Epps, years ago?    

Yeah . . . Epps wasn't a Confidential Human Source.  That's according to FBI Director Wray's statement to Congress (even though Epps was a chapter leader of the Oath Keepers, of which the FBI had imbedded no fewer than 8 CHSs . . . according to the NYT).

And they had CHSs within the Proud Boys, too . . .  revealed during the trial discovery process, by the defendants.

Both groups (some members) are charged with Jan. 6 crimes and yet, once again according to Wray, the FBI had no credible info regarding violent activities, planned by either group, prior to the "insurrection", from these sources!  (At least that's what Wray stated in his testimony to Congress).

What's weird is, Wray testified (to Congress) that ANTIFA was an ideology, NOT an organization (as Trump alleged), immediately prior to the 2020 election.

So . . . if ANTIFA was NOT an organization, as stated by Wray, why were they using Proud Boys informants to provide information about ANTIFA chapters, to the Bureau?  Oh, yeah . . . BLM, too.  (Thanks again, NYT!)

More stooge lies and propaganda.

(09-19-2023, 10:39 PM)BlueTiki Wrote:

(09-19-2023, 09:15 PM)rothschild Wrote:

Didn't Duchess tell you to pound sand when you asked her to lookup Ray Epps, years ago?    

Yeah . . . Epps wasn't a Confidential Human Source.  That's according to FBI Director Wray's statement to Congress (even though Epps was a chapter leader of the Oath Keepers, of which the FBI had imbedded no fewer than 8 CHSs . . . according to the NYT).

And they had CHSs within the Proud Boys, too . . .  revealed during the trial discovery process, by the defendants.

Both groups (some members) are charged with Jan. 6 crimes and yet, once again according to Wray, the FBI had no credible info regarding violent activities, planned by either group, prior to the "insurrection", from these sources!  (At least that's what Wray stated in his testimony to Congress).

What's weird is, Wray testified (to Congress) that ANTIFA was an ideology, NOT an organization (as Trump alleged), immediately prior to the 2020 election.

So . . . if ANTIFA was NOT an organization, as stated by Wray, why were they using Proud Boys informants to provide information about ANTIFA chapters, to the Bureau?  Oh, yeah . . . BLM, too.  (Thanks again, NYT!)

More stooge lies and propaganda.

With everything Trump had gone through with the FBI, he goes and plays right into their hands. I think we can add him to the gullible stooge list at this point, and those who continue to support him.

And who in their right mind would want to replace him, knowing they would almost certainly be subjected to the same treatment? No one I can think of that isn't a "rump" Republican that knows his/her place in the "new normal".

It was just an observation, reminiscent of the good ol' times during J. Edgar's tenure . . . and NOT about Trump or his disciples.

A minimal show-charge, to a known instigator and active participant of an insurrection, demonstrating the DOJ's commitment to bring all to justice who participated in the attempted coup.

Too bad Wray doesn't "drag" like Hoover.

He'd be immune from criticism.