Thread Rating:
  • 46 Vote(s) - 4.46 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Johnny S. Clarke & Lisa Straub- young Ohio couple murdered
7/9/2012 1 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR STATE TO DISCLOSE INTENT REGARDING EVIDENCE PUSUANT TO
OHIO CRIM.R.16
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD
7/9/2012 2 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FILED BY PROSECUTOR
TO CONVEY WITNESS FOR TRIAL
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
http://lcapps.co.lucas.oh.us/obpublicacc...44898a017f
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
http://lcapps.co.lucas.oh.us/obpublicacc...8482db46c1
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
The documents I just posted here won't stay available very long. They are forever available on Lucas County Court Dockets. The witness, to be transported from Pickaway in Orient, OH. is Travis Jones. The documents when posted last about as long as Chris Dale's FB! hahaha OMG I'm missing Bachelorette. Later
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
(07-09-2012, 08:07 PM)Older Than Dirt Wrote: The documents I just posted here won't stay available very long. They are forever available on Lucas County Court Dockets. The witness, to be transported from Pickaway in Orient, OH. is Travis Jones. The documents when posted last about as long as Chris Dale's FB! hahaha OMG I'm missing Bachelorette. Later

I read over this and Travis Jones is a Toledo Ohio BP gas station robber!
Williams and Pettaway were already in Jail and then Jones joins them, so he must have found out some information during his visit with Williams and Pettaway, now he is a witness. The State of Ohio requests if this witness is transferred to LCCC that a "keep-separate" mandate be ordered by the Court due to safety concerns. Looks like July 23rd 2012 a Monday testimony is scheduled to begin and they expect to call Jones then.

Let's hope a few people from Mock will be able to attend trial, Johnny and Lisa had so many friends let's hope a few friends attend trial. Maybe someone could start a Facebook page on Johnny and Lisa trial notes or come on Mock with trial notes. Just a big thank-you! in advance to all that aim to make the trial.
"A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone."
Henry David Thoreau
Reply
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/10/2012 1 Title : ORD:JUDGMENT ENTRY
500-000007244 (DMS)
This matter came on to be heard upon the motions filed by
the defendant, Cameo Pettaway for Disclosure of
"Certified" Witnesses filed on March 12, 2012 and the
Motion to Compel Discovery filed under seal on June 19,
2012. The Court will rule on these motions together due
to the interlated portions of the motions and due to the
upcoming trial date.
I. Certification of Witnesses
1.The Court has been advised by counsel, that the State of
Ohio has agreed to disclose the discoverable information
concerning the certified witnesses on or before July 10,
2012. The motion will be deemed moot.
II. Motion to Compel
2.The defendant filed under seal a Motion to Compel to
avoid any problems with the "gag" order previously issued
by this Court. The sealingof the motion also protects the
names of potentil witnesses. The Court has repeatedly
advised counsel that if either the State or the defendant
failed to comply with Rul 16 discovery that the Court will
preclude testimony at trial. The Motion to Compel
includes fifteen subheadings, which are quite disturbing
so close to trial. To maintain the privacy of certain
witnesses, the Court will rule according to the
defendant's paragraph numbers and not mention names. This
entry will also be subject to the certification filed by
the State:
1)Granted
2)Granted
3)Denied
4)Denied
5)Denied
6)Granted
7)Granted but limited to prior record.
8)Granted
9)Granted
10)Granted
11)Granted
12)Granted
13)Denied
14)All records of this identity of any DNA evidence
available shall be
disclosed.
15)Granted - any evidence which may tend to inculpate
anyone other
than Pettaway or Williams shall be disclosed.
It is so ORDERED
Date:
JUDGE JAMES D. BATES
=========================================================
Case Number: G-4801-CR- 0201102645
State of Ohio vs. Cameo Pettaway
PRAECIPE
TO THE CLERK:
Within three days of journalization, please serve upon all
parties notice of the judgment in a manner prescribed by
Civ. R. 5(B) and note the service in the appearance docket
(see below).
Dated:
Judge James D. Bates
Merle Dech
610 Adams St.
2nd Floor
Toledo, OH 43604
Mark Geudtner
610 Adams St.
2nd Floor
Toledo, OH 43604
Jeff Lingo
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
700 Adam
Toledo, OH 43604
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/10/2012 2 Title : EVT:J.E. FILED & JOURNALIZED
MOTION HEARING
E JOURNALIZED 07-10-12
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/10/2012 3 Title : SRV:COPIES MAILED
MOTION HEARING
SENT TO
MERLE DECH
610 ADAMS ST
2ND FL
TOLEDO OH 43604
MARK GEUDTNER
610 ADAMS ST
2ND FL
TOLEDO OH 43604
JEFF LINGO
ASSISTANT PROSECUTING ATTY
700 ADAM
TOLEDO OH 43604
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/10/2012 5 Title : SUBPOENA TO PROD EVID GRANTED
LUCAS COUNTY JAIL/LUCAS COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
I don't type well and I'm slower than hell, but here is one small part of a document pertaining to Williams case yesterday. This court needs to be aware that the time of the recorded conversations is an astounding 360 hrs. It would take an atty. or juror approximately 9 wks. to listen to these conversations given a normal work week schedule. WTH ??? Hard to believe!
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
(07-10-2012, 05:56 PM)Older Than Dirt Wrote: I don't type well and I'm slower than hell, but here is one small part of a document pertaining to Williams case yesterday. This court needs to be aware that the time of the recorded conversations is an astounding 360 hrs. It would take an atty. or juror approximately 9 wks. to listen to these conversations given a normal work week schedule. WTH ??? Hard to believe!

Who was recorded?
Reply
Jail house calls.
Reply
(07-10-2012, 09:35 PM)Adub Wrote: Jail house calls.

I hope somebody was stupid enough to say something of significance.
Reply
(07-10-2012, 05:56 PM)Older Than Dirt Wrote: I don't type well and I'm slower than hell, but here is one small part of a document pertaining to Williams case yesterday. This court needs to be aware that the time of the recorded conversations is an astounding 360 hrs. It would take an atty. or juror approximately 9 wks. to listen to these conversations given a normal work week schedule. WTH ??? Hard to believe!

I believe defendant wants notification in advance which segments of the recorded jail house telephone calls are going to be brought up in the trial.
More nonsense IMO. I cannot imagine what 360 hours of recorded telephone conversations would cost and how many CDs are involved.
"A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone."
Henry David Thoreau
Reply
The prosecution has to disclose everything they'll be using, don't they?
Reply
Justice for Johnny & Lisa
June 10 via mobile
So sick and tired of all you sick vile murderes thieves robbers rapist child molesters drug dealers PLEASE do the world a favor and kill yourselves you are all a true menace to society trust me none of you demons will be missed!

now THAT's pretty damn funny! hah

















































Reply
(07-11-2012, 03:17 AM)shitstorm Wrote: The prosecution has to disclose everything they'll be using, don't they?

yes, rules of discovery.

















































Reply
7/10/2012 2 Title : EVT:ORD PUB PROCEED FILE/JOURN
THE BLADE
PHOTOGRAPH
E JOURNALIZED 07-10-12
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD
7/10/2012 3 Title : ORD:CONVEYANCE ORDERED
580-000007558 issued by 153 ()
The Sheriff of Lucas County is ordered to convey the
inmate, TRAVIS JONES, Inmate #A657-835, from the Pickaway
Correctional Institution to the Lucas County Court of
Common Pleas on or before Thursday, July 19, 2012, for
the purpose of testifying during the week of July 23,
2012, before the Honorable DEAN MANDROS. The defendant
has been convicted of the offense of ROBBERY- F3.
INMATE TO BE HELD AT THE LUCAS COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER
UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS INMATE BE "KEPT SEPARATE."
SEE ATTACHED MOTION.
JUDGE DEAN MANDROS
Dated:
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
7/10/2012 2 Title : EVT:ORD PUB PROCEED FILE/JOURN
THE BLADE
PHOTOGRAPH
E JOURNALIZED 07-10-12
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD
7/10/2012 3 Title : ORD:CONVEYANCE ORDERED
580-000007558 issued by 153 ()
The Sheriff of Lucas County is ordered to convey the
inmate, TRAVIS JONES, Inmate #A657-835, from the Pickaway
Correctional Institution to the Lucas County Court of
Common Pleas on or before Thursday, July 19, 2012, for
the purpose of testifying during the week of July 23,
2012, before the Honorable DEAN MANDROS. The defendant
has been convicted of the offense of ROBBERY- F3.
INMATE TO BE HELD AT THE LUCAS COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER
UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS INMATE BE "KEPT SEPARATE."
SEE ATTACHED MOTION.
JUDGE DEAN MANDROS
Dated:
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
7/11/2012 1 Title : SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE
ISSUED TO:
LUCAS COUNTY JAIL/LUCAS COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER
1622 SPIELBUSCH AVE
TOLEDO OH 43604
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/11/2012 3 Title : PLDSmiley_emoticons_skeptischUPPLEMENTAL
FILED BY PROSECUTOR
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/11/2012 4 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FILED BY PROSECUTOR
FOR JURY VIEW
PARTY : D1 - PETTAWAY CAMEO
7/12/2012 1 Title : ORD:MOTION DENIED
632-000005865 issued by 226 ()
This matter came on to be heard upon the Motion for Jury
View filed on behalf of the State of Ohio by attorney
Jeffrey Lingo and Louis Kountouris. Upon the
consideration of the motion filed July 11, 2012, the Court
denies the same.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the
motion is denied.
Dated:
JUDGE JAMES D. BATES
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
defining certain motions may be helpful:


Motion to modify bail, which requests a judge modify a defendant’s bail status
Motion to dismiss complaint, which request the judge to dismiss a case on the basis of a insufficient criminal complaint against a defendant
Motion for bill of particulars, which if approved by a judge, will require the prosecutor to detail all charges, as well as the reason for filing these charges
Motion to reduce charges, which requests a judge reduce charges to accurately charge a defendant for an alleged criminal incident
Motion for change of venue, which defendants request their judicial proceedings be moved elsewhere to ensure a fair trial
Motion for to strike a prior conviction, which if approved by the judge, will potentially prevent a defendant from facing the penalties and other sentencing guidelines associated with a repeat offender or person with a criminal record
Motion for discovery, which is a formal request for the prosecution to turn over all evidence they possess regarding a defendant’s case
Motion to preserve evidence, which forces the prosecution to preserve all evidence until a defense investigator or expert can evaluate the evidence
Motion to disclose identity of an informant, which if approved, will allow the defense to attack the credibility of an informant’s motives and testimony
Motion to examine police personnel file, which can be requested if a law enforcement officer’s past conduct and history is relevant to the defense’s existing criminal charges
Motion to suppress evidence, which if approved, will allow the defense to exclude certain pieces of evidence that were obtained illegally, coerced, or tainted in some manner
Motion for speedy trial, which can expedite the process of a trial to prevent government entities from refusing to release a defendant, but also, not brining the individual to trial for any actual crime

Trial Motions in a Criminal Case

During trial, both sides can make motions to the judge. For example, the defense may file a motion in limine, which attempts to keep inadmissible evidence out of the court and from the knowledge of jurors before it is even introduced. Another example, while much rarer, includes a motion to allow jury to view crime scene, which forces the judge to accompany the jury at the crime scene. Typically, these motions must be strongly supported by the defense to be approved. In the event the prosecution shouts out inadmissible evidence or testimony, the judge will order a motion to strike testimony, which essentially orders jurors to forget what they just heard. Another common defense motion made during trial occurs following the prosecution’s presentation of evidence. At this point, defendants may motion for dismissal because the prosecution failed to support a strong enough case against a defendant to proceed.

















































Reply
I don't know if they still do this, but for years WSPD who hates the Toledo Blade, would start their morning program with "we read the Blade so you don't have to". I feel that's what I'm doing posting all this court stuff! But I just wish that the documents, that explain everything I post, would stay open long enough to even bother doing it!!!!!! If I post them it makes everybody wonder what they missed! Really, it's a piece of cake to check all this out online. Also, If I go to court, I think it will be for Pettaway. Maytee can still attend for him, I think
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply
LC, thank you, thank you!!!Blowing-kisses
[Image: Naughty_Grandma_by_Momma__G.gif]
Reply