02-22-2010, 01:13 PM
(02-22-2010, 10:26 AM)D Wrote:(02-22-2010, 08:55 AM)IMaDick Wrote:(02-21-2010, 06:51 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: Hmm? It is not about me, it's about the standard on the site. You are going to have to ask Duchess to defend it from this point forward if she cares to - I've explained it fully. It's her policy now.
thats the problem MF, if the info was posted by you some place the rules make it exempt. Just as a point of order this part of the rule has not been explained, in fact its been avoided.
The exception is that you can post a link to any public website, or post any information they themselves have posted.
One small correction. His name appeared in the credits. But by being a "credited" crew member, he gives permission for such information to be PUBLICLY AVAILABLE. The ban for the last link Lumpy posted is illegitimate, and we all know it. Even more so under the rule Dick quoted. But even without that rule it shouldn't be a bannable offense, since Rank could have simply requested he NOT be credited for his part in what was linked to. So we come again to the fact that Lumpy is banned for RANK's mistake of not requesting privatization of his information.
Sorry the truth is no longer admissible as evidence in the Mock court of law, where Duchess is the judge and MF is the jury.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.