06-06-2011, 02:19 PM
yes i find him credible. and so will the jurors.
this is a new test/evidence, never been used. but precedents do get set in trials.
unless baez can discredit him i see it as being useful. i hear from courtroom tweets that baez is boring the snot out of the jury and making an ass of himself.
Vass is the innovator of this science. he is currently the accepted expert.
this is a new test/evidence, never been used. but precedents do get set in trials.
unless baez can discredit him i see it as being useful. i hear from courtroom tweets that baez is boring the snot out of the jury and making an ass of himself.
Vass is the innovator of this science. he is currently the accepted expert.