06-16-2011, 02:29 PM
Christ, baez literally put me to sleep 
. i just woke up and got back here. makes me wonder about his 'impact' on the jury.
as usual Dick i disagree with you
.
this is a circumstantial case, the state had PLENTY and presented it in a cogent way. they wisely left out a lot of superfluous stuff that may have muddled the jury and muddied the water. and despite what many think, circumstantial evidence is GOOD evidence. scott peterson was convicted and sent to death row with less.
and mitigation does not enter equation until penalty phase. after a conviction.
. i just woke up and got back here. makes me wonder about his 'impact' on the jury. as usual Dick i disagree with you
.this is a circumstantial case, the state had PLENTY and presented it in a cogent way. they wisely left out a lot of superfluous stuff that may have muddled the jury and muddied the water. and despite what many think, circumstantial evidence is GOOD evidence. scott peterson was convicted and sent to death row with less.
and mitigation does not enter equation until penalty phase. after a conviction.