05-14-2013, 11:55 AM
(05-14-2013, 01:15 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I'm anxious to find out what Judge Nelson allows in.
If she allows them both, we'll see the battle of voice technologies, each with inherent margins of error that could be easily exploited by the other side. Right or wrong, the perceived credibility or likability of the expert witnesses could determine which side wins the battle.
Or, the expert witnesses could simply cancel each other out in the minds of the jurors. I suspect that happens frequently with expert testimony related to less definitive sciences. Lots of time and money invested with little return on investment when it comes to verdict impact. JMO.
With or without the voice experts, it's gonna be an interesting trial, that's for sure.
I agree, it would be an interesting dynamic to see those technologies played out.
Anything open to that degree of interpretation though probably shouldn't be allowed IMO.