05-30-2013, 12:26 PM
(05-30-2013, 12:14 PM)Adub Wrote: There doesn't have to be any precedent. If the Fowler son probably did it he will be adjudicated. The lawyer is just blowing smoke.
I don't think they're counting on a dismissal based on age either.
While there doesn't need to be a precedent to blow the smoke out of the room, doesn't hurt that the state has a case of an even younger defendant who's already been similarly processed with which to counter.
Guess we'll see what happens in July, unless the defense attorneys follow through with a dismissal motion before then.