YOUR SEXUALITY

[HairOfTheDog]

Oh piss off HoTD!

I work in health.

Haha. Some thing's never change.

Despite your insistence that you know more than everyone here about this HEALTH issue, you are again ignorant and deflecting. Big surprise.

In order to prove your thesis you need to have evidence to explain your perception. I wouldn't use a source such as unicef. Whilst they do wonderful work, I wouldn't use them as a source if I was investigating the spread of the virus. Maybe something like the World Health Organisation, and I wouldn't just use one source, you need more than that to speak from a place of truth.

You are not only what Martin Luther King, Jr. labeled as "sincerely ignorant', you are also what he referred to as "conscientiously stupid". Had you the mental and emotional intelligence to actually look at the documentation of scientific facts provided to you (per YOUR request) before continuing your rant, you'd have seen the World Health Organization right there on the front page of the Unicef report. You'd also have seen UNAIDS. It's a collaboration.

And, as is true with nearly every scientific research report (HEALTH or otherwise), it includes Appendices, References...The report that you were provided contained citations from the most credible HEALTH professionals in the world on the subject of AIDS. Some of them, dare I say, might even have more expertise when it comes to HIV/AIDS than you. Really.

So, what's next, ignoramus? Questioning the methodology used in the scientific research because the results contradict your spewings?

Don't waste your energy on that type of deflection, again. Here's a gift. The methodology, including sources of participation in the review process by the leading experts in the countries covered in the report, can be found on page 223 of the PDF. You're welcome.

You cannot make a blanket statement about a specific group of the population without backing it up with facts. That is called bigotry.

I made no such blanket statements in my response to you. I stated the facts, backed them up, and also acknowledged the truth in your statement about other segments of the population/demographics affected by the disease.

That's not bigotry. It's accuracy. You labeling me a bigot or homophobic is like me crowning you the queen of successful romantic relationships. Anyone with basic comprehension skills and who actually reads what's posted here would know that's called lunacy.

There is no doubt that the AIDS epidemic was/is a phenomenon. This would have been investigated and explored in detail in scientific based medical journals with actual facts and statistics. I know from working in the area of health that HIV+ has never been referred to as a gay disease. In fact, you could find yourself struck off or suspended if you started using that kind of language.

Well, hey, you've acknowledged that the AIDS epidemic exists. You got something right.

As for me, I haven't used any language that would get me struck from anywhere, aussie. You're talking shit.

I am surprised at you supporting unsubstantiated hysterical hate filled homophobia. Then again, dogs are pack animals and you are sticking with the pack on this one.

There's no pack. There's just you claiming to be the victim of one that doesn't exist; your standard fallback when you show your ass and then can't stop yourself from showing it again and again.

In reality, there's only you spewing absolute bullshit in an all-knowing condescending manner, no less, and people more knowledgeable than you calling you out for it. Don't like the language used by some here in the process? Try reading some actual scientific studies; pretty good chance the language therein won't offend you. Pretty good. At Mock, people can use the language that suits them best when making their points - accurate points, in this case. We're not scientists. Another big surprise, for you?

Do your own homework next time, aussie. You've got enough problems to overcome without adding "lazy" to your resume.