04-28-2014, 09:48 AM
I wonder if Rochelle Sterling (pic below) wants the team transferred into her name?
![[Image: 227932-0-600.jpg]](http://dy.snimg.com/story-image/0/0/227932/227932-0-600.jpg)
My wheels are spinning and I could be totally off-base, but it looks to me like Donald Sterling might be the target of a squeeze play. Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy, if so.
Rochelle Sterling takes legal action to get back "gifts" that her husband gave a mistress. Why? The Sterlings are dripping money. Why would she take legal action and make it a matter of public record that her husband is such a sucker over what's a drop in the bucket to the Sterlings?
And, why would Rochelle think that the mistress should give the money and gifts back and that a court of law would compel V. to return them? If Sterling gave them to V. willingly and without her promising something she didn't give in return, I think she's probably gonna get to keep the Ferrari, the Bentleys, the condo... Rochelle is a smart woman -- I wonder if her motive for filing that suit had very little to do with what Donald gave V. and more to do with pushing Donald to give her the Clippers?
Anyway, I don't know what the Commissioner should do either, but they need to have a buyer before they could consider forcing him to sell and even a historically lesser-successful team like the Clippers don't come cheap.
I will not be surprised if the solution is to have Rochelle Sterling legally made the owner of the team and Donald Sterling a silent partner, or something of the sort. Rochelle is very active with the Clippers. She went to the game last night, told reporters that she's not a racist a few times, and stated that the Clippers mean everything to her family.
My wheels are spinning and I could be totally off-base, but it looks to me like Donald Sterling might be the target of a squeeze play. Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy, if so.
Rochelle Sterling takes legal action to get back "gifts" that her husband gave a mistress. Why? The Sterlings are dripping money. Why would she take legal action and make it a matter of public record that her husband is such a sucker over what's a drop in the bucket to the Sterlings?
And, why would Rochelle think that the mistress should give the money and gifts back and that a court of law would compel V. to return them? If Sterling gave them to V. willingly and without her promising something she didn't give in return, I think she's probably gonna get to keep the Ferrari, the Bentleys, the condo... Rochelle is a smart woman -- I wonder if her motive for filing that suit had very little to do with what Donald gave V. and more to do with pushing Donald to give her the Clippers?
Anyway, I don't know what the Commissioner should do either, but they need to have a buyer before they could consider forcing him to sell and even a historically lesser-successful team like the Clippers don't come cheap.
I will not be surprised if the solution is to have Rochelle Sterling legally made the owner of the team and Donald Sterling a silent partner, or something of the sort. Rochelle is very active with the Clippers. She went to the game last night, told reporters that she's not a racist a few times, and stated that the Clippers mean everything to her family.