06-24-2014, 11:26 AM
OK, on the one hand, fine, we do not need this POS bringing more kids into the world. BUT, why shorten a child endangerment sentence because he gets snipped? How can they assure he will no longer endanger the life and welfare of the children he already has. I do not see how one equals the other.
Snip him, yes, but let him pay the full legal consequences for the child endangerment. Lesson may still not be learned, but justice will be served.
Snip him, yes, but let him pay the full legal consequences for the child endangerment. Lesson may still not be learned, but justice will be served.