04-19-2016, 07:18 PM
(04-19-2016, 04:19 PM)Love Child Wrote: I saw it to mean any woman in genaral, not just those that do porn. The consumer of porn could view all women as commodity and objects. That would be my interpretation.
Also he said he did not want to ban porn, but to protect the children. I don't see how that could be bad.
I looked up the article and that is the way I understood it too. I don't think he meant that the adult entertainers who choose to do that for a living are being exploited, that would be ridiculous.
He was talking about the consumers and how they could get a distorted image of woman and treat them as objects to be abused. I don't agree with that either, however. I don't think porn causes men to abuse women anymore than I think Ozzy Osbourne lyrics causes people to become devil worshipers or violent video games causes kids to become serial killers. If you are any of those things you'd still be that way with or without it. You're not a normal, rational person to begin with.
The bill did address child pornography which should be the biggest priority.