Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Presidential race 2016
Author Message
Maggot Offline
Supermod
*****

Posts: 26,186
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #3333
RE: Presidential race 2016

(05-28-2018 08:04 PM)Donovan Wrote:  You do know the "I" stands for "Investigation" right?. It's kinda their fucking job to investigate possible criminal activity against the United States. Obstruction and Treason, for example. And they do so using informants and sources.

I left out your liberal hate Trump rant because it was just...........Well, stupid.

I am just wondering how many other "confidential human sources" were actually spread out among the flock of electoral candidates in order to "protect" them.






You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
05-28-2018 08:17 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

ZEROSPHERES Offline
Geschlechtslos
*

Posts: 3,075
Joined: Feb 2011
Post: #3334
RE: Presidential race 2016

Maggot is waiting for Trump to shoot someone on 5th Ave. It would be the first campaign promise he kept.









[Image: giphy.gif]
05-28-2018 08:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Maggot Offline
Supermod
*****

Posts: 26,186
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #3335
RE: Presidential race 2016

(05-28-2018 08:17 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote:  Maggot is waiting for Trump to shoot someone on 5th Ave

I thought he already did. Smiley_emoticons_shocked her name was "Hillary"






You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
05-28-2018 08:20 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

ZEROSPHERES Offline
Geschlechtslos
*

Posts: 3,075
Joined: Feb 2011
Post: #3336
RE: Presidential race 2016

I am wondering why the F.B.I. wasn't looking into the underhanded back room deals Hillary was making to exclude Bernie from having a chance long before this alleged collusion the Trump campaign is accused of.









[Image: giphy.gif]
05-28-2018 08:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Maggot Offline
Supermod
*****

Posts: 26,186
Joined: Jun 2008
Post: #3337
RE: Presidential race 2016

Debbie Wasserman had Pakistani IT guys have complete control over the DNC servers, they are now under house arrest. Bernie got a really bad shake out of it all but nothing was said about that either.


Nothing to see here.......move along.


"national review" hah

Although the NYT has their own special spin on things........






You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
05-28-2018 08:34 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****

Posts: 25,326
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #3338
RE: Presidential race 2016

(05-28-2018 08:00 PM)Maggot Wrote:  So the F.B.I. used a "Confidential human sources" agent, (Not a spy?) into the Trump administration to "help" his campaign? And Mr. Obama did not know anything about it because he did not read it in the paper would be the logical conclusion if a person was not influenced by anything within the sphere of reality.

I wonder how many other election candidates had a "confidential human source" agent within their organization especially within the DNC. Bernie on the other hand may have had some other Tomfoolery bestowed on his campaign. But that's not in the report.

That's not what we said, it's what you heard because it fits your narrative. I posted the known facts.

Mueller's team is not leaking. Much of the public's knowledge regarding what's being investigated in relation to possible collusion/conspiracy is coming from public statements by Trump and his surrogates in their attempts to discredit evidence/info that hasn't even been presented or uncovered.

There are also indictments against Russian operatives, along with indictments and guilty please from some of Trump's campaign advisors. Some of the charges/pleas are for lying to investigators about meetings with Russian operatives, and some are for financial crimes stemming from the Mueller investigation but not tied to Russian interference at this point (as far as the public knows).

No one has claimed that Russian operatives didn't attempt to interfere with other candidates' campaign. We know that Russians attempted to bolster Bernie and Jill Stein in the primaries in order to siphon votes from Hillary Clinton. That's been made public and verifed.

However, if Sanders' and/or Stein's campaign colluded or conspired with Russian operatives, there's no evidence of it in the public realm. That doesn't mean it hasn't been investigated or isn't being investigated. The same is true for the Clinton campaign, though it seems highly unlikely that Russians were trying to help her beat anyone considering intelligence officials concur that Russia's goal was to hurt Clinton's campaign. Putin's disdain for Hillary Clinton and the sanctions she spearheaded against Russia is not exactly a secret.





05-28-2018 09:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****

Posts: 25,326
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #3339
RE: Presidential race 2016

(05-28-2018 08:34 PM)Maggot Wrote:  Debbie Wasserman had Pakistani IT guys have complete control over the DNC servers, they are now under house arrest. Bernie got a really bad shake out of it all but nothing was said about that either.


Nothing to see here.......move along.


"national review" hah

Although the NYT has their own special spin on things........

That article is filled with supposition and opinion. And it's from July of last year. It's not exactly like the Republicans are hesitant to investigate Hillary Clinton for alleged breaches of national security and they control all branches of government now. So, why aren't they investigating if there's any there there?

I can't stand Wasserman-Schultz and am not compelled to defend her in any matter. But, there really isn't anything of substance to see in the article you posted. If the writer's opinions are investigated and substantiated, then the responsible people in the Clinton campaign need to be held accountable if laws were broken.

And, I've covered the Wasserman-Schultz led DNC's proven (but not illegal) favortism of Clinton over Sanders at length here at Mock. It rubbed me way wrong then and now. It was not overlooked.





05-28-2018 09:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply Reply

Post Reply