04-01-2016, 01:11 PM
Pffft. That's your M.O. Gunnar, the proof of which is all over the board.
If I get the facts wrong, and I sometimes do, I just say so and correct them. If I'm convinced to reverse my position/opinion, I just say so and why. It's not difficult and the proof is all over the board.
Trump reversed his position on this one to align with the Pro-Life leaders. Maybe he did it because he was initially uninformed of their firm stance that the woman is always a victim and he agrees with their criticism of his original position. Maybe he disagrees with them, but isn't willing to stick to his guns because he wants their support and doesn't want to alienate more women. I don't know why he reversed his position on punishing women for illegal abortions, just that he did.
He might have been tired. He's not held a political office before. He might not have been prepared to be pushed to answer by Anderson and/or Matthews. Regardless, there's no argument that he reversed his position. He reverses and modifies his positions on the same issues a lot, much more than the other candidates. I don't care if you and Cutz think it's no big deal and consider him a viable candidate anyway or if you don't acknowledge/agree that he does it. I don't consider him a viable candidate for that and other reasons. Difference of opinion.
If Cutz wants to focus on proving that HOTD is stupid and weak because he sees it differently, and you want to project your weaknesses on to me because that's just you, you boys can go to town on it and I won't interfere.
If I get the facts wrong, and I sometimes do, I just say so and correct them. If I'm convinced to reverse my position/opinion, I just say so and why. It's not difficult and the proof is all over the board.
Trump reversed his position on this one to align with the Pro-Life leaders. Maybe he did it because he was initially uninformed of their firm stance that the woman is always a victim and he agrees with their criticism of his original position. Maybe he disagrees with them, but isn't willing to stick to his guns because he wants their support and doesn't want to alienate more women. I don't know why he reversed his position on punishing women for illegal abortions, just that he did.
He might have been tired. He's not held a political office before. He might not have been prepared to be pushed to answer by Anderson and/or Matthews. Regardless, there's no argument that he reversed his position. He reverses and modifies his positions on the same issues a lot, much more than the other candidates. I don't care if you and Cutz think it's no big deal and consider him a viable candidate anyway or if you don't acknowledge/agree that he does it. I don't consider him a viable candidate for that and other reasons. Difference of opinion.
If Cutz wants to focus on proving that HOTD is stupid and weak because he sees it differently, and you want to project your weaknesses on to me because that's just you, you boys can go to town on it and I won't interfere.