12-10-2015, 08:37 PM
That's a good point, Maggot.
I think there would probably need to be a classification within the watch list that signifies those with known violent threats, communications, or actions. That subset would be restricted from guns. People who simply express understanding or agreement with controversial ideologies probably shouldn't.
I disagree with you that refugees should be the sole focus though. The biggest threat of violent terrorism to the U.S. (and most other countries) lies within. Refugees aren't committing most of the mass attacks in this country; natural born U.S. citizens are.
I think there would probably need to be a classification within the watch list that signifies those with known violent threats, communications, or actions. That subset would be restricted from guns. People who simply express understanding or agreement with controversial ideologies probably shouldn't.
I disagree with you that refugees should be the sole focus though. The biggest threat of violent terrorism to the U.S. (and most other countries) lies within. Refugees aren't committing most of the mass attacks in this country; natural born U.S. citizens are.