05-10-2023, 03:38 AM
If by "all" you mean all, the viability becomes zero because government disarmament isn't on the table. Beyond that, disarmament won't solve the problem of increasing insanity unless you show that guns are what's driving the degeneration of mental health. Gun violence is to a great extent psychotic behavior, and removing guns won't remove the psychosis, so at best your suggestion is mitigation, rather than a solution.
Looking at the scope of total disarmament -- assuming that it is viable -- do you really think the benefits would warrant such a massive outlay, or could that money be better utilized in some other way, such as improving the quality of leadership our nation suffers under?
Looking at the scope of total disarmament -- assuming that it is viable -- do you really think the benefits would warrant such a massive outlay, or could that money be better utilized in some other way, such as improving the quality of leadership our nation suffers under?