ANOTHER SCHOOL/PUBLIC SHOOTING

[rothschild]

If by "all" you mean all . . .

assuming that it is viable -- 

"YES" . . . I meant all. I repeated it several times.

"Assuming that it is viable . . . "  Why assume, RC?  By all means, if you have evidence to the contrary that banning and firearm confiscation is ineffective in the countries employing this strategy . . . POST IT.

So . . . after reading your "Adventure in Mental Masturbation" response, what you are really saying is:  "Yeah . . . I've got nothing to offer that would be as effective as firearm banning and confiscation to prevent mass shootings."

Claiming something is viable without presenting anything that supports the claim can aptly be described as mental masturbation. Demonstrate that a government that has overwhelming military superiority will voluntarily disarm itself, or can be disarmed by it's civilian population.

Furthermore, you've presented nothing that suggests gun violence is more than a symptom. Until you do, your "solution" is nothing more than mitigation; which, interestingly, would necessitate the very thing you claim it would solve, because complete disarmament could only be accomplished with military force that would involve gun violence.

I sincerely hope that you're trying to be absurd here, because if you aren't, you may soon end up in the mud with Piglet.