05-10-2023, 03:37 PM
(05-10-2023, 02:09 PM)rothschild Wrote: Claiming something is viable without presenting anything that supports the claim can aptly be described as mental masturbation. Demonstrate that a government that has overwhelming military superiority will voluntarily disarm itself, or can be disarmed by it's civilian population.
Furthermore, you've presented nothing that suggests gun violence is more than a symptom. Until you do, your "solution" is nothing more than mitigation; which, interestingly, would necessitate the very thing you claim it would solve, because complete disarmament could only be accomplished with military force that would involve gun violence.
I sincerely hope that you're trying to be absurd here, because if you aren't, you may soon end up in the mud with Piglet.
What I have presented is that if there are no civilian guns . . . there can be no mass shooting deaths of and by civilians.
I do not care what motivates the civilian's finger on the trigger. If there is no civilian gun trigger to be pulled . . . no one will die from being shot by a civilian.
You really can't be this stupid not to grasp this very simple concept of "no civilian guns . . . no gun deaths by civilians ".
Is that "dumb-downed" enough for your comprehension? Or are you that stupid?
I guess you'll just keep jerking-off . . . as you were the one who raised the viability issue . . . and somehow cannot either confirm or deny its effectiveness.