07-03-2014, 11:27 AM
But, how do you manage it in a way that seems more organized when you've got one camp, elected by the people, who focus almost exclusively on the cost (real or perceived, monetary and otherwise) and another camp, elected by the people, who focus almost exclusively on the humanitarian issues?
Should the federal government try to be an interventionist mandating consistency between states? Or, should the states be able to decide their own laws and priorities in regards to immigration, welfare, gun control, etc...
There are countries where diversity is discouraged and one person and his delegation determine what's best for everyone. I'd rather be here than there.
Should the federal government try to be an interventionist mandating consistency between states? Or, should the states be able to decide their own laws and priorities in regards to immigration, welfare, gun control, etc...
There are countries where diversity is discouraged and one person and his delegation determine what's best for everyone. I'd rather be here than there.