VIOLENCE VS SEX

[crash]

Would you say that he is a godly person and/or a good person because of his belief and worship of god and his religious devotion?

This is where the whole semantics argument comes into it..

I would see him as not a good person. Anyone who can molest a child, is not a good person in my opinion.

I would be conflicted between thinking he used being godly as a mask to hide his true desire, or being godly was something he felt he had to do to balance out the scales for his bad temptations, you know, it's ok if I'm sorry type of thing. Either way, I wouldn't see him as being truly righteous, just that he was a godly (as in aligned himself with god, or hid behind him) scumbag.

What I think Cutz's argument is, is that if the guy can molest a child, then he is not like God, therefore he is not godly.