02-09-2016, 03:27 PM
(02-09-2016, 10:46 AM)Midwest Spy Wrote: LytoMe, if you get a chance read the transcript of Dassey's confession from 2⁄28 or 3⁄1 of 2006.
It's long, and was conducted at the police station after his interview at the school.
Read that and tell me you think he lied about all the details.
I don't think he was coerced or made the story up.
Which is why I'm sure the film's producers chose not to include any of it in the program.
I just pulled up the February 2006 transcript, that was more interesting of a read then the March 2006 one.
This interview gave more of a consistent with some of the evidence, I will agree with you on that one. And it does paint a totally different picture as to how the murder was carried out, and what exactly happened.
In saying this, I still think that a new trial should still be granted. Guilty or Not Guilty with the way it was handled I believe it was very unfair of a Judge to allow it to go down the way it did. If he is in fact guilty he will be found guilty again.
And I do understand that this documentary is solely for the defense, I do get that they show what they want you to see. Editing, filming what they want you to see and not filming what they don't want you to know. I am not naive to that, I just feel with what was presented a new trial should be granted.