02-11-2016, 03:53 PM
Beyond a shadow of a doubt is not something that any prosecutor needs to prove. Beyond reasonable doubt is the burden and that's a much different bar.
We're not in a court of law here, but I don't get the impression that MS is claiming Avery and Massey are guilty of the murder without a shadow of a doubt.
I get the impression that based on the evidence he's reviewed, he's convinced beyond reasonable doubt that Avery and Massey are guilty of the crimes for which they were convicted.
We're not in a court of law here, but I don't get the impression that MS is claiming Avery and Massey are guilty of the murder without a shadow of a doubt.
I get the impression that based on the evidence he's reviewed, he's convinced beyond reasonable doubt that Avery and Massey are guilty of the crimes for which they were convicted.