Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Making a Murderer -- DID STEVEN AVERY REALLY KILL TERESA HALBACH?
(08-23-2016, 10:07 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:
(08-23-2016, 04:59 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: The defense forensic expert witness testified that the blood sample his team tested from the car was positive for EDTA.

The FBI forensic expert witness testified that the blood sample his team tested from the car was negative for EDTA.

He also testified that Avery's blood which had been stored in a purple vial were positive for EDTA presence (as expected).

Correction to the bolded text:
It was the defense attorneys, not a defense expert witness, who suggested that blood drawn from Avery in his rape trial was removed from the storage vial and planted in Teresa's car. The rest is accurate. The FBI tested blood from the scene after the blood planting allegation was made by the defense attorneys and concluded that Avery's blood found in Teresa's car did not contain EDTA like blood in the vial did, which the prosecution used to quash the planting allegation.

Defense Update:
As of March, Kathleen Zellner was focusing on alleged pings from Teresa's cell phone 12 miles from the Avery property, which she claims proves that Teresa left the property before she was killed (and also proves that Avery had insufficient representation from Strang and Buting). In addition, she said that she was focusing on alternate suspects, one sex offender in particular, along with the limited DNA testing in the case. Ref: http://www.newsweek.com/2016/04/08/kathl...41470.html
According to the analysis of what is on line that was recently posted by the FBI, that is false. The blood from Theresa's car contained EDTA. The FBI and former FBI laboratory hematologists are trying to explain away the EDTA in the sample by claiming that the analyzer was contaminated with EDTA from the positive control. Then they went on to say that blood stains "didn't have enough EDTA" which to someone that knows their way around a blood laboratory doesn't make a lot of sense. You are either using an analyzer, or you're using archaic methods of blood stain. Your typical analyzer uses about 0.2 MM of blood to test so there was plenty to test. If your sample is contaminated, you use a PH 7 solution to clean the probe and take another fucking sample. Why anyone would go through the pain in the ass to run a blood stain (which needs about 1CM) when you have an analyzer in front of you just makes no sense at all. It's smoke and mirrors.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Making a Murderer - by Blindgreed1 - 12-31-2015, 11:13 AM
RE: Making a Murderer - by QueenBee - 12-31-2015, 11:29 AM
RE: Making a Murderer - by ScientistsCanvas - 01-06-2016, 04:51 PM
RE: Making a Murderer - by Midwest Spy - 01-06-2016, 07:13 PM
RE: Making a Murderer - by Donovan - 01-06-2016, 08:35 PM
RE: Making a Murderer - by HairOfTheDog - 01-09-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: Making a Murderer - by HairOfTheDog - 01-09-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: Making a Murderer -- DID STEVEN AVERY REALLY KILL TERESA HALBACH? - by Blindgreed1 - 08-24-2016, 09:35 AM
Steven Avery Netflix series - by Pokemon999 - 08-23-2016, 09:32 AM