09-30-2018, 11:45 PM
(09-30-2018, 11:33 PM)Carsman Wrote:(09-30-2018, 11:13 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Not on the list is the third accuser, Michael Avenatti's client Julie Swetnick.
Also not on the list are the former classmates (some of whom supported Kavanaugh's nomination) who have come forward to say that Kavanaugh lied under oath about the heavy extent of his drinking in college.
I don't really care if Kavanaugh drank like a fish back then, but I do care if he bald-face lied about it over and over under oath and if he still drinks heavily today. I hope that's looked into.
In 2016, Judge Kavanaugh wrote a case supporting the use of lie detectors in background checks. I'd sure like to see him agree to take one in regards to the sexual assault allegations. But, I bet he won't.
Ref: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politic...tt-n915061
The FBI must give a lie detector test to the Judge, if he refuses, he's admitting he has something to hide and knows he
won't pass! His accuser took one, so he must take one also to make things more level.
Passing a lie detector will help his credability, and make him more believable. If he doesn't take one, well . . . . . . .
I think it would be a great idea. He has stated that he will do whatever he is told to do. He has so far. If they ask him to do this I am sure he will. However If he passes this. It will not "help his credibility" The same people that are screaming that he is a rapist and that Ford should be believed and why would she lie, will keep believing that he is not credible.