THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY

[Fry Guy]

Well, well, there was an awful lot of bullshit to unpack here, Snowflake, though I am impressed you did not fallback to you usual default mode of victim and of being oppressed by me. No doubt you will whine after I critique YOUR dipping your oar into this disagreement with Duchess, that my response to you is me being creepy and obsessive.

How dare you!  

How can you even think that about FryGuy just because he:  

--Whines and calls anyone who mocks/criticizes Trump childish names (which is ironically also largely what Trump is being criticized for)..............in the 'TRUMP PRESIDENCY' thread, no less.    

Whines or argues? When does one become the other? What "childish names" have I called anyone? No, I am not saying I have not said anyone I see enagaged in idiotic behaviour an idiot, anyone engaged in immoral reasoning immoral or anyone being silly or stupid, silly or stupid, but this is neither childish nor childish names. In EXACTLY the same way that I can disagree with Duchess calling me a troll but I do not think her labeling me as such is her being childish, nor her description of me being a troll as being childish. It is what she thinks. It is just not true that I am being a troll. So you DON'T have an issue with anyone here disagreeing, or describing those holding differing opinions in unflattering terms and YOU and Duchess, to whom you are defending, do this.

Hell LOOK AT MY SIGNATURE. Who said that? Did you say EXACTLY that? Was THAT childish?

You are a little bit of a hypocrite deep down aren't you?

--Questions the honesty and intelligence and morality of informed members who express political views which don't align with his because he doesn't like their style..............whilst frequently citing baseless conspiracy theories as fact to back his rhetoric and ironically insisting that people who don't share his views are too 'emotional'.  

Well unlike you who position those you do not agree with as child molestation supporter, rape apologists and creepy obsessive stalkers, right? Is there really not introspection? Are you really riding the morality high horse so hard that you cannot see you are probably of everyone here the least well positioned to try this? I mean plenty here will fuck around a bit and are not PC but the only one who comes close to where you have gone in amoral posting is me.

Yet you are playing a moral champ here. Good luck with that.

--Accuses people of thinking they're more intelligent than others.....................despite the fact that he's the only member here who posts lessons on how to think and presumes to tell others what they shouldn't say.  I picture him wagging his finger and shaking his head when I read that nagging bullshit.

Careful where you go with this presuming bullshit. You know fuck all about me and it is a dangerous road to start imagining me and what I think or feel. First it is imagining me finger wagging and next you will be like Rootilda and imagining be naked and with a boner. Slippery Slope.

Yeah.......FryGuy could be a troll.  But, that makes too much sense to explain the intensity of his nonsense, in my opinion.

I do not think you are really in much position to judge nonsense. No Bono fides.

Personally, I think it's more likely that he's truly just a strange, pompous, and hypocritical "old man who amuses himself by saying horrible things on the internet"; a dude who tries way too hard to come across as a devil's advocate or provocateur, but fails miserably with all but the couple who share his blind worship of the U.S. President and agree with him politically.

Actually could it be possible......now think over this very hard.......I post what I want when I want and as to how I feel at the time and on the subject titles that interest me in this forum. I know this is probably a something hard for you to imagine. I MUST be a troll or have some overriding agenda, or I must be wanting a specific reaction or be driven in one specific direction. None of that is the least bit true. I will be the first to admit I AM reactive. I would imagine most posters are. Not all.

Some will stew on every post and take some time working out what they will say and how they will say it. I don't. I share what I think and with very little filter. I post as to how I feel. If I agree I will normally agree and say why I agree. If I don't agree I will say why I don't agree. If I think someone is being silly, disingenuous, crazy, dishonest or outrageous, I have no issue telling them. Being that I am on a Mock Forum, I have no issue making fun of them either.

You seem to read an awful lot into shit.

NOW, you don't REALLY think he's a troll anymore, do you Duchess?  No.  Because that would be retarded, right? Right.<--a little impression there.  

I don't think Duchess is retarded for thinking so (no idea who you are impersonating) but I do think she is misreading intention and behaviour. Would make her incorrect but not dishonest.

Anyway, I like reading most everyone's posts in regards to the TRUMP PRESIDENCY, regardless as to whether I agree or disagree with the comments.  That's precisely what this thread is for, of course.

Don't really give a fuck what you like.   That said, If you are anyone were to say "I do not like Trump because he is someone that I believe is unsuited temperamentally to be President, I think he is too crass, I do not think he is articulate and whatever, I really have no issue with that.
Hell, If you say "He is wrong to pull troops out of Syria", I will disagree. I do not think he should be in Syria and exposing more troops to harm for no real return. Now someone could make a number of good counter points such as "America has gone in and kicked a hornet's nest and no they ought to manage the consequences" or "What about the poor Kurds?" or "This will likely destabilise the region and leave a vacuum"
These are some of the positions that are not that I agree with BUT are NOT dishonest or immoral or disingenuous and would support the position I disagree with.

So it simply would not be true for anyone to infer that just because I disagree with a position I NECESSARILY think that the person presenting a counter-point is being dishonest or immoral.......would it?

I have no issue if someone does not like Trump. There is a lot to dislike or at least be uneasy with. He is very different to most other Presidents and has a completely different style. I get it. BUT when people make up shit to support a dishonest premise just to virtue signal their dislike of him, I call it out whenever I see it.

You say I do the same in reverse, maybe I do and maybe I don't (I do not believe that I did) Call me on it. I don't mind.

Your above quotes do look a little trollish. Why is that?